Controversy at Flex

1169 Words5 Pages
Controversy at Flex Kendra Torbet MGT 626 Tiffin University New companies have a tremendous burden placed on their shoulders at the time of opening but if the company can introduce themselves at a time when the industry is new and immature it can enhance their overall performance. However, when the industry begins to be overrun with more and more players, it can increase the tensions to perform the competitors over. Many times with increase tensions to perform well, it can drive the company to make risky and sometimes unethical decisions. Corporate governance has an enormous impact on how companies are run, and all companies want to make the best decisions for the stakeholders of the company. However, sometimes the right decision in one person’s mind is far from the best decision to make. This is the same situation that Flex Packaging Limited found themselves in 2001. November 8, 2001 Indian woke up to the news of an arrest of a well-known entrepreneur, Ashok Chaturvedi, he was the owner of Flex Packaging Limited along with the arrest of Someshwat Mishra, the central chief excise commissioner (Mishra, 2007). The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) recovered $25,000 from the commissioners’ car and office that was being held for Chaturvedi and he was accused of evading to pay excise duties and bribing the central chief commissioner (Mishra, 2007). “CBI alleged that Chaturvedi acted as a middleman to the Pan Masala (chewable tobacco) industry and the central chief excise commissioner” (Mishra, 2007). This was not the first controversy that Flex Industries had faced. They had been accused of supplying and printing materials for Yashwant Sinha’s of BJP election campaign (Mishra, 2007). Another controversy they faced was when Prahbat Kumar was forced to resign as governor of Jharkhand after Chaturvedi admitted to paying for three parties held between 1999-2000 at

More about Controversy at Flex

Open Document