He has overlooked at answering mobile phone while having a conversation is impolite and it interrupts the conversation. In addition, the author is guilty of oversimplification when Ingram considers the relationship between mobile phones and the concentration of young people. First of all, the author is guilty of overgeneralisation when he considers an example about Horlick and his student. The example is that when they have conversation, a student has a call, and she answers a mobile phone. This thing makes her teacher feel impolite.
Karen Last: 31/07/2012. Unit Reference: Y/601/1695 Recording of Evidence: Unit Level 3 /Unit credit value 3 / Unit Reference: Y/601/1695Unit Title: Understand how to safeguard the well being of children and young people. (7.2) Describe the ways of reducing risk to children and young people from: * Social networking * Internet * Buying online * Using a mobile Ways of reducing the risk to children and young people from using, social networking sites, we need to have more heightened public, awareness also private, advice given via the CEOP organisation, of the dangers. Children can sometimes be unaware of this controversial area. They need to be taught not to give out personal info such as telephone numbers as well as their emails addresses, as their information can be pieced together to make a fuller profile of themselves, which can be used against them, to gain their trust and confidence to be possibly be groomed or even worse taken (snatched) .
We have to act fast and get these laws in place so that our children will not ruin their lives becoming sex offenders. Parents need to educate, and discuss sexting with their children and pay attention to what is going on. Parents need to pay attention to what their children are doing on their cell phones. While the internet has parental controls on which websites the children may go to, cell phones do not have that ability. Do not feel like it is an invasion of privacy to look at your kid’s text messages.
Mr. Magee, The question of whether cell phones should be allowed in schools has been debated over the years. Most school administrations regard cell phone use as disruptive and distracting, and have implemented policies that prohibit using them on school grounds. There are benefits to letting the student body use their cell phones at school. Your parents can reach you in the event of an emergency, and vice versa. If in danger, we can reach the authorities or a medical provider.
Firstly, Ingvar claims that talking on mobile phones in pubic areas can be disturb other pubic people. Secondly, she states that because of mobile phone, people feel annoying when overhearing 50% of a communicate. The author walks on to claim that answering a rotary phone while having a conversation is flying in the bad colors. In addition, she indicates that the mobile phones interrupt home life in a not so good way. Finally, she believes that youth now cannot focus on things like shakespeare for a long time because of mobile phones.
However, text messaging has been a major problem with students texting in class interfering with the disruption of their learning. Most teachers express how they feel about cell phones being a distraction to others, however very few students have complaints about the use of cell phones in class. Text messaging in class should be allowed by choice of the students, it can easily be discreet and the possibility of an emergency. Text messaging in class should be allowed by the choice of students. In the argument “Tapping into Text Messaging” by Janet Kornblum, says teens, techies and other early adopters leading the charge to text say it is a great way to communicate when they are too busy to talk or when making a call would be rude or impractical.
Ludden uses a serious and factual tone towards her audience and reader’s to try and convince them on how to decrease the use of technology within teens. After reading the article, I have come to realize that teen only use their cell phones for the latest gossip going around or for social media, but sometimes there are ways teens find their cell phones to be useful in their lives. One reason is that teens find it easier to get their work done by using their cell phones to communicate with their friends to get what the missed out on. For example, contacting a friend or classmate to get the latest homework assignments when they are sick or just what the teacher had explained is how teens find their cell phones being useful in their everyday life. Additionally, sometimes it could be a good thing to find out the rumors or gossip going around because it could be about them or one of their friends.
Censorship of Books in School Should people be able to deny a student’s freedom to read any book they want to at school? Every time an adult bans a book, children lose the chance to gain knowledge from it. The students’ outlook on the world becomes narrower as they lose access to an insightful piece of literature, and prohibiting books like that limits a students’ access to fantastic literary texts. Book censorship in schools limits the education of minors, and the students’ can’t receive the full knowledge inside. Book banning has a huge negative effect on how students live, at school as well as at home.
By banning books, it creates a very negative effect on kids and possibly even eliminates life teaching of life lessons for student. Also, going through life without the knowledge of what else is out there besides "rainbows and lollipops" can be pretty detrimental, as kids would not be able to handle life too well in the real world, if the whole time when they were younger they were being protected from all the "bad things" More over , many decide to do what they is best for the safety of children, but sometimes it harms them in more ways than helping them. So clearly , books shouldn't be banned from society . On the other hand , some books have suggestive content of profanity. However, when you keep the so-called negative parts of the books in kids gain knowledge of what and what's not good to do,say,or,act.
The whole purpose behind classes at college or even in some high schools is for the student to write their own notes based on the teacher's lecture or lesson. This is a difficult skill and so the distractions should be kept to the minimal. When students are given only paper and pen the worse they can do is doodle. However, a laptop does not just have Microsoft Word or Word-pad, it has games and the Internet on it, (which would be very tempting not to surf the web) it would take a restrained teenager not to be lured during a boring lesson (I know I would). Teachers and professors have little control over what their students are doing on their laptops, thus it is a distraction for them too, as stated also by Elena Choy about the upraised laptop lids and how the teacher wouldn’t have any eye contact with them.