Case 11-6 Trublood

548 Words3 Pages
According to IAS 17- paragraph 7, the classification of leases is based on the extent to which risks and rewards incidental to ownership of a leased asset lie with the lessor or the lessee. IAS 17-paragraph 8 also mentions that a lease is classified as an operating lease if it does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership, while a finance lease is determined if it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership. 1. Based on the IAS 17-7 and IAS 17-8, the junior accountant's analysis was incorrect. The junior accountant interpreted the lease as an operating lease based on the fact that the equipment reverts to the lessor at the end of the lease. However, in this case, all risks and rewards of ownership are substantially transferred to the lessee. 2. IAS 17-paragraph 10 states that classifying a finance lease depends on the substance of the transaction rather than the form of the contract by meeting individually or in combination situations (a) through (e). Of these situations, two have been met: (c) the lease term is for the major part of the economic life of the asset even if title is not transferred and (d) at the lease inception, the present value of the minimum lease payments amount to at least substantially all of the fair value of the leased asset. As a result, the senior accountant's judgement based on the useful life of the equipment is accurate. In terms of calculations, the present value of minimum payments using the annuity table would be as follows: $100,000 * 2.4869 = $ 248,690 + 15,026 (Residual value) = $ 263,716 This calculation shows how the minimum lease payment amounts to substantially all of the fair value of the leased asset, of $265,000. However, the senior accountant made an error in using the straight-line method for interest expense.

More about Case 11-6 Trublood

Open Document