Canadian Family Debt Analysis

1729 Words7 Pages
Debt and Recreation Among Canadian Families The average Canadian household lives with an average debt of approximately 96,000 (www.ctv.ca). This forces our society to become consumed by work. We are being obliged to spend countless hours at the workplace in order to pay for the things we need, the bills we accumulate and the families we need to support. The stress of debt is causing employees to spend the majority of their leisure time working, and through this stress, workers are beginning to notice and act upon the importance of taking time for oneself. Wealth and time in Canadian families are become scarcer, yet the field of recreation is continuously expanding. In fact, it is placed among the top 10 growing fields in America (www.careersandcolleges.com).…show more content…
Though we strongly encourage recreation as a healthy way to fill leisure time, should we accept clients in our facilities knowing that they are in debt with the community? Take this popular situation for example. A family would like to enroll themselves in a 10-week outdoor education program. This family is in debt, and has not been repaying the debts off regularly for lack of means. The cost of this course is $200 per member, totaling at an expense of $800. Even though this course will distract from stress, educate and bring the family closer together, it is $800 that they do not have in their pockets to spend, and it is money that they could be using to pay off their unresolved debts. A difficult decision now needs to be made. Although many would agree to let a family participate in this course, from a recreation professional’s standpoint, I do not believe that this is the most ethical action. There are many ethical routes that a recreational professional needs to reflect upon when making this decision, and we must take each of them into consideration. Throughout this essay, we will see arguments from both a Kantian point of view and a utilitarian view. Though both views make a solid point,…show more content…
Philosopher John Stewart Mill describes utilitarian acts as “…actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill, p. 58). Motives for actions do not matter, as long as the result is a positive and desired one. Utilitarianism works upon the happiness principle, which means that for an act to be considered morally justifiable, you must do what maximizes pleasure in your life (Mill, p.58). Although this point of view seems like a great view to live by, it may be flawed, especially when it comes to monetary debt within the community. A flaw that I have come across is that it is difficult to determine exactly what a utilitarian act is. Consider this example of a man moving from Canada to Europe. He is unsatisfied with his life in Canada, and spontaneously decides that he will leave his family and loved ones for a new and happier life. Is this considered a utilitarian action? It is difficult to determine. It is true that the man is making himself happier by moving away, but what about those he left behind mourning his absence? How does this action maximize pleasure if more people are unhappy then happy? This can surely be debated among utilitarian thinkers, but it
Open Document