Apple Vs Samsung Case Study

754 Words4 Pages
Microsoft's ongoing legal battle with Samsung Rights over patents can be licensed out in numerous ways so that the licensee is authorized to use certain component of the technology with the author’s permission and pay the licensor on usage basis. The two multinational technology giants are engaged in a royalty wrangle over patents concerning smartphones. Microsoft has contended that Samsung delayed paying it $1 bn in patent royalties in the year 2013 for the use of Android owes interest to the tune of $6.9 million and eventually filed a lawsuit in a New York district court. Meanwhile, Samsung filed for arbitration in Hong Kong's International Court of Arbitration to avoid cumbersome litigation and come to an agreement. According to the agreement, in simple words, Samsung had to pay royalty fees on every android phone it sold. The 2011 deal also needed Samsung to create Windows Phone products and share confidential business information. The lawsuit in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York is Microsoft Corp vs. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 14-6039. The subsisting licensing agreement between the two of the year 2011 is alleged to be breached the moment Microsoft had acquired Nokia (its…show more content…
There are myriad examples as that of Nokia v Apple in the year 2009, Apple v Samsung in 2012 and so on. The South Korean corporation had denied the jurisdiction but the US court upheld it in accordance with the provision of the law i.e. the diversity jurisdiction codified at 28U.S.C. § 1332. The code grants jurisdictions to US district courts exceeding the sum or value of $75,000, excluding interests and costs between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state. In the instant matter, the two parties are present, one of which is US based and the other being a foreign corporation. Moreover, the pecuniary estimation exceeds the prescribed value of the

More about Apple Vs Samsung Case Study

Open Document