We should never try and force our feelings onto others, an individual may feel upset and sad, it’s no good if we go to them all happy as it shows we don’t respect them, we should talk with them and find out if possible why they are upset and make them feel included. A person’s heritage and beliefs are a big part of their lives, it is what makes an individual unique, all of us have our own beliefs in what is right and wrong, acceptable or unacceptable eg. when to clean or change clothes. Religion has effects on the way a person lives, it is important to respect and honour their religion even if it’s not the same as my own, I do not go to church regularly even though I did when I
All Muslims seek to be martyrs. The tern is used to describe this act was important, whereas; suicide bomber implied an impulsive act by a deranged individual. The missions were ones that were deliberately and carefully chosen as part of their religious obligation. Rantisi emphasized “we do not order them to do it, but give them permission for them at certain times”. These acts were only allowed in response to acts of violence brought on by the Israeli side, which frequently affected innocent civilians.
Each suspect had its own reasons that could have been seen as reason enough to kill Malcolm. “We didn’t want to kill Malcolm! His foolish teaching would bring him to his own end” (Begum, Hnn.us)! These words, taken directly from the mouth of Elijah Muhammad imply a lot more than what it looks like. By saying that they (the Nation of Islam) didn’t want to kill Malcolm, implies that they felt they were compelled or had to.
Question 1: Anne Hutchinson was a threat to Puritan society in a combination of ways that other dissenters were not, which is the reason she was banished. The Puritan society in Massachusetts was established not so that people can exercise freedom of religion, but only so the Puritans can freely exercise their religion. These were a very intolerant people of any one else’s religious belief; and, their leaders did everything possible to keep other religions from prospering. Their main belief was that the entire community had to follow God’s laws as interpreted by their leaders and if they did then God would reward them. However, if the entire community did not follow God’s laws then the entire community would be punished.
As Quoted in Millers book by the Character Mr. Hale, he states:” We must not blame each other but fear god and his Wrath.” This quote helps us to understand that we cannot blame others but must go through what trails an tribulations that god has intended. Mr. Hale also goes onto say that “we must look into ourselves to find what has thy done to anger god.” With all accusations going around our ancient society there is always going to be a minority in society. Lastly the connections with the McCarthy era and the people of Salem portrayed in Arthur Miller’s play of the Crucible are the impact of the government and the opinions of society. The government in tiny ways gives the public an image of what a problem is and then follows public opinion for popularity. A great example of this is given by Miller’s Character Reverend Paris a minister in Salem that is blaming others so that his reputation may not ceed.
From in a cell, he jots down almost rebel like ideas, which is to be free from having a religion forced upon any single being. In this initial strategy of steering the emotions of the readers, Pane tells the readers “I believe in one God, and no more” (100), he exposes his stance but does not overly enforce his beliefs so the readers will not be subjected to them. I think that this is very important because if Pane did over insert his views then he would be going against his own teachings. Pane then goes on to talk about a few religions, discussing the problems he finds with them. I found this to be his main strategy of grabbing the reader’s attention and expressing his purpose to them.
This relates back to the experiment, because the participants obeyed even though they knew it was not right to shock the learners, and King probably would have encouraged the participants to stop. Moreover, King strongly disagrees that the government should have the authority to guide people when there are many wrongdoings in the governmental system. His ideal social relations are far from dependent on obedience because he believes everyone to be equal. Also, he knows that total obedience often lead to tragedies like the segregation and racism that African-American are suffering from. Milgram’s conclusion really advocates King’s belief, because the surprising conclusion of obedience to authority is what King does not believe to be the way of social relations.
This belief is not shared by most Americans, but is shared by many Iranians as away of life and last resort mean. Not a way to oppress womes. Though Americans may not agree with it they must learn to respect or at least try to understand the culture of the Iranian people. Some Iranian people believe that the government of America is trying to destroy their religion. What these Iranian have to understand is that their media is corrupting information, because America’s government tries its best to respect the religion of other people; after all it was found based on the idea.
He said, “Yes, most Muslims are disappointed that they are being looked down upon, but are thankful for the freedom they have to choose what they are allowed to do and how much or little they practice for their religion.” The common physical objects that symbolize the Islam community, is the Star or David and the Kaaba in Mecca. He explained that the modern age of Islam doesn’t really have a true symbol that has meaning, but to associate a “brand” or a symbol for Islam for other religions to understand and recognize would have to be the Star of David known as the crescent moon. Also, he mentioned what would be the closest to symbolize Islam, and that is the Kaaba of Mecca. This is a temple of worship that millions of people go to every year and is represented as the bridge between Heaven and Earth. Also, minarets were used years ago in mosques.
And yet, upon each article I've read, there seems to be no reciprocation on their part for the tolerance of other religious practice in their territory. Everyday, non-Muslims convert to Islam and society does not complain. But when Muslims convert to Christianity or another religion, a well-demonstrated protest and disapproval insinuates within their religious faction. Adding to the growing unrest that transition of democracy, or lack thereof, in the region beguile policies to deter policymakers, leaders and governments to a reaching and formidable agreement, is the unnecessary baggage that this issue curtails in world politics and international relations. Domestic turmoil in The Maghreb countries undermine the already unstable foundation of the struggling growth of the region in all aspects of development: politically, institutionally, economically and socially.