In this speech he talks about the violence in Longton he says, "I warned all who had been part of it that they were not the friends, but the enemies of freedom. I told them that this strike for the Charter would bring ruin, if those who claimed to be its supports broke on law". From this source we can see that he believes the violence undermined the Chartist cause. He states that if the people involved in the violence admitted to being Chartists then they would essentially just been seen as a bunch of hooligans which is evidently not the image the Chartists were going for when they needed to be taken seriously amongst a cabinet completely full of middle to upper class Ministers. Thomas Cooper clearly believed that any violence would undermine the cause.
In this case, nature was considered as unpredictable, had a great potential for extreme disasters and had uncontrollable power. The terrifying and violent images of nature invented by artists during the romantic period recalled the 18th century aesthetics. In British and French paintings of the early eighteenth century, the presentation of the struggle of man against the power of nature highlights this sensibility. Romanticism, which cannot be expressed using a single technique, attitude or style, is characterized by a highly subjective approach, such as visionary quality and emotional intensity (Tekiner, 2000). The context of romanticism can be equated to a reaction against the enlightenment age.
His comment ultimately set the attitude and conflict of the story. The shocking act of smearing the rug with excrement eventually leads to the rug’s complete destruction, which then leads to another court hearing, and another act of revenge. For having his rug destroyed Mr. de Spain seeks payment of a hundred dollars but knowing Abner’s living conditions he made an agreement in which he asked for twenty bushels of corn. Abner’s destruction is a swipe at the financial security that the de Spain has and that Abner lacks, as well as a clear statement of his unhappiness at being the subservient to de Spain for his livelihood. Extending his criminal reach to the rug signals that Abner’s resentment now encompasses the domestic sphere as well.
Bertrande constantly questioned and confided in those closest to her only to be told she was mad. “All my household believe me to be mad”. The priest, who was an important figure at the time, dismissed Bertrande’s speculations and did not express any doubt about the strangers identity. Rather, he reassures Bertrande that men change over time and that Bertrande should “pray for understanding” . When Bertrande went on to sue Arnaud, he discouraged Bertrande to bringing the lawsuit against the rogue imposter as he was convinced that the man Bertrande was accusing was the real Martin.
Beatrice is the one that starts this one. “I wonder that you will still be talking Signior Benedick nobody marks you.” This shows us that Beatrice wants to talk to him but she does it insulting him. Benedick responds really quickly “What my dear Lady Disdain! Are you yet living?” Here Benedick is saying that Beatrice feels that she is inferior to everyone and she can say anything because she is inferior. In Act II where there is a party in Leonatos house Beatrice talks to a masked man and tell awful things about Benedick to him.
this arrogance by Birling is shown through his lack of care for his family and his priories are climbing the social ladder and stopping a public scandal. At the start of the play the inspector question Mr Birling on the death, Birling quickly responds violently and says “you weren’t asked to come here and talk to me about responsibility”, in the house Birling is advert and he is used to people respecting him and him talking down to other people, this way is challenged when the inspector arrives, and because Birling is arrogant and feels that because he was “lord mayor just two years ago” he is above the lower class and the working class(the inspector). And he feels that he shouldn’t even consider the less fortunate than him “community and all that nonsense” and this kind of attitude annoys priestly and this shows the dislike for Birling from Priestly and how he is portraying it to the audience of
She filed suit against the Long Island Railroad Company for negligence. The jury verdict entered judgment in favor of the Long Island Railroad Company holding the railroad liable for her injuries. The railroad company appealed the judgment to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department of New York which affirmed the trial court’s verdict that the railroad was responsible. The railroad appealed to the Court of Appeals of New York. Issues 1.
Rebellion and independence defined these movements, creating artist that were bound together by their unique style of creating art. The Impressionism art movement began late in the 19th century when a group of radical artists were rejected by the Academy of Fine Arts. An annual art show called, “the Salon,” which was sponsored by the Academy, set the standards for what was accepted as art(Dillen, 2011). The very opinionated panel of judges, thought to be experts, usually judged art based off of tastes and styles that hadn't changed in decades. Anything that was unfamiliar or considered new was seldom chosen and usually “crucified by the critics”(Janaro & Altshuler, 2009 p. 143).
The Impressionist Era of Paris during the late 19th century was a revolutionary movement against the salon-styled Parisian art exhibitions that had formed and taken prestige, simply not waiting for Paris to accept their work before exhibiting the work. While drastically different from the art of the Parisian salons, Impressionism has become a marker of modernity, technique, light studies, and coloring. This is certainly the case in Mary Cassatt’s “In the Loge,” and Edgar Degas’s “Ballet from an Opera Box.” However, despite the similar scene of the social and pivotal Parisian Opera House and the acquaintance of the Impressionist movement and technique, the meaning and depiction as well as the way the interplay between the performers, spectators, and viewer are strikingly different between the two paintings. Cassatt’s “In the Loge,” details unique commentary on the role of women through the techniques and formal qualities displayed in the work. Cassatt decides to show the women in the loge in black clothing, which is significant because the only other women wearing black are much older than that of the main subject and that the men in surrounding boxes are wearing black as well.
The first inkling of Modernism came after the French Academy refused 5000 works. Outraged by this censorship a Salon for the Refused artworks was created by Emperor Napoleon to exhibit the rejected art. Modernism can be considered as a Golden Age for art as well as a time of radical revolution against tradition. Impressionism began in Paris, France the art capital of the world in the late 1860’s. It was initiated by a group of artists (Claude Manet, Camille Pissarro, Auguste Renoir, Mary Cassatt, Edgar Degas, Paul Cezanne, Alfred Sisley and Edouard Manet) who were tired of following the traditional style of art and so decided to rid themselves of these ‘outdated’ shackles and began to paint unconventional subjects and outdoor landscapes.