Impressionism Vs. Post-Impressionism

1264 Words6 Pages
Impressionism and Post-Impressionism An Analysis and Critique of Impressionism and Post-Impressionism Rachael Polston Western Governors University January, 2011 Impressionism and Post-Impressionism An Analysis and Critique of Impressionism and Post-Impressionism Impressionism and Post-Impressionism were two artistic movements that began late in the 19th century and ended during the beginning of the 20th century. The Impressionism era brought about new subject matter and techniques that were criticized for many years. However, it eventually became as authoritative as the traditions it replaced, bringing with it many great masterpieces that inspired future generations many years later. Post-Impressionists pushed the acceptability even further, with new techniques and radical uses of color. Rebellion and independence defined these movements, creating artist that were bound together by their unique style of creating art. The Impressionism art movement began late in the 19th century when a group of radical artists were rejected by the Academy of Fine Arts. An annual art show called, “the Salon,” which was sponsored by the Academy, set the standards for what was accepted as art(Dillen, 2011). The very opinionated panel of judges, thought to be experts, usually judged art based off of tastes and styles that hadn't changed in decades. Anything that was unfamiliar or considered new was seldom chosen and usually “crucified by the critics”(Janaro & Altshuler, 2009 p. 143). Prior to the Impressionism movement, art mostly consisted of religious or historical subjects. However, this movement brought about new subject manner of natural beauty, impressions of scenery, and uses of light and color in new ways. Many of these artists chose to paint outdoors, instead of in the traditional studio setting. “This enabled them to observe nature more directly and

More about Impressionism Vs. Post-Impressionism

Open Document