One of the reasons is because they authors that write the papers are not interested in the subject that they are writing about. Another reason that Wikipedia should not be used for academic research papers is because many of the articles are one sided and biased so there is only one side to the article, this leads to miscommunicated information. The reason that information is so misjudged today is because there are many articles that are on sources such as Wikipedia. Knowing which sources are credible helps to understand the research that the people do. By looking through the periodicals and situations, they are able to understand the information that is being presented to the argument.
Additional non-academic sources may also be used, however students need to show an understanding of their validity. Sources such as Wiki…, scribed.com, docstore.com, etc. are not considered acceptable sources and should not be used – reliance on such sources will result in a fail grade. Presentation: Report format – 3000 - 3500 word Word.doc or Word.docx (word count applies to content only, not title page, executive summary, table of contents and reference list). Responses should have a title page attached reflecting the content and the author, executive summary, table of contents, introduction, suitable headings and sub-headings to cover the relevant content and elements of analysis, conclusion, recommendations, reference list/bibliography, appendices (if relevant).
Plagiarism usually comes in two forms: intentional and unintentional. Intentional/deliberate plagiarism includes directly copying, summarizing, or paraphrasing a source without giving credit to the author or putting it in quotation marks. This type of plagiarism also includes turning in a paper that has been bought, written by another student, or copied from another source. Unintentional plagiarism is when a writer uses another author’s thoughts or ideas without realizing credit must be provided. This includes working in groups and submitting the same answers as other students, forgetting to place quotation marks around a direct quotation, omitting a text citation for a summary or a paraphrase, and omitting a text citation for the ideas of another writer.
As for the procedures in the article itself, there seems to be an over-reliance on anecdotal evidence, with the argument being supported with stories about one person or with hypothetical situation. There is a distinct lack of hard data, but as the author acknowledges that there is a need for more empirical research, this should not necessarily be taken against her. Furthermore, this article is a part of a mini-series dealing with this topic and
It is unacceptable to allow someone else to write your assignment for you. Information found on a website or from a book copied into an assignment and swapping some of the words around is also unacceptable and will be classed as
Brass and Burkhardt (1993) coincide that their study is limited. They cautioning the readers or others investigator to not generalize their study’s results to other organizations; due to the flexible environment in the organization examined. Another limitation is the quantity of mechanical and interactive variables that could essentially be involved. Thus, they did not have comprehensive lists of any possible foundations of authority or tactical actions. Brass and Burkhardt (1993), suggested upcoming investigation covering the study at both the micro and macro stages of examination.
Choose a topic that is relevant to the material provided in Chapter One. In class, display the types of resources available on that topic. While in the Cybrary, collect information on the criminal justice system’s response to terrorism after the attacks at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Find at least one article that highlights individual-order concerns and one that highlights public-order concerns. In class, display (or duplicate) the article and have students compare and contrast the findings from the different articles.
Changing a few words or phrases from another writer’s work is not enough to make the writing “your own.” The writing is either your own or the other person’s; there are no in-betweens. 3. In text citation and an accurate bibliography, acknowledge that the fact or opinion expressed comes from another writer. If the language comes from another writer, quotation marks are necessary in addition to a correct citation. If you are in any way uncertain about what constitutes plagiarism, consult with me.
Assignment 4 Unit 8 I enjoyed reading your essay. Please note the following errors so you could improve when writing future assignments. Relating to my marks and comments on your paper, you would benefit by using the APA manual and Kaplan’s writing center that will assist you how to use proper grammar, writing mechanics, and formatting. I am confident that you will do better on your next assignment. * The introduction did not provide sufficient background on the topic and previewed major points.
Information that is fed to various Internet sites has to be input by someone, according to (Bedford/St.Martin’s.con 1457620960). Information should be researched and cited properly once posted. This allows for the viewer to cross check the information. This sounds like the best solution. However, this may be the proper thing to do, but let’s face it… it’s not happening that way.