Stewart and Peter decided she would sell her shares for 60 dollars per share. On December 27, 2001 Stewart said, “She did not know whether the phone message Bacanovic left for her was record.” (Martha Watch) Stewart knew, but concealed and covered up the message was recorded in the phone message log. Stewart also stated she talk with Bacanovic. Stewart knew but concealed and covered up she spoke to Douglas Faneuil, not Bacanovic. Stewart also was apart of a conspiracy willing fully and knowingly tried to hamper the SEC investigation on her stock sale by providing misleading information.
One cannot make a contract for past services. Reasoning Peter Dementas failed to prove there
Facts of the Case Navy welder Charles Richmond was receiving disability annuity based on his prior civilian service in the Navy. Charles made more than the allotted monies he was supposed to during the months he was receiving the benefits. Charles asked an employee relations specialist at the Navy Public Works Center's Civilian Personnel Department for information about how much he could earn without exceeding the 80% eligibility limit. The specialist gave Charles the wrong information about the OPM 2 year eligibility rule that dated before in 1982. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) denied him six months of benefits after the year he had made the additional money that disqualified him for the benefits.
Charter Golf, Inc. vs. Ken Lisa Harris LS311 Unit 5 Assignment 1 April 1, 2014 Toni Starcher Charter Golf, Inc. vs. Ken Charter Golf, Inc. manufactures and sells golf apparel and supplies. Ken worked as a Charter sales representative for 6 months when he was offered a position with a competing firm. Charter’s president, Jerry, offered Ken a 10% commission “for the rest of his life” if Ken would turn down the offer and stay on with Charter. He also promised that Ken would not be fired unless he was dishonest. Ken turned down the competitor’s offer and stayed with Charter.
Reasoning that amounts to nothing more than a "tortuous chain of hypothetical transmittals" is insufficient to infer access. . .
Unfortunately Bank United does not modify investment properties therefore no modification can be done as of now.. I call on a weekly basis to see if there are any changes but it is to my understanding that Mr. Cohen is current on this file *Yaniv Cohen – *1839 Cross Point Way *11-19*-09 I called Amtrust for an update. They stated that he cannot qualify for a modification due to having the lowest rate already available. (4.25% I/O) I resubmitted the file and requested a 30 year fixed with escrows. The previous negotiator said this would not be possible but I currently have the file with another negotiator (KIM PSHIRER) who may be able to assist.
It must include the fundamental terms of the agreement with the intention that no further negotiations are to take place. An invitation to treat is different to an offer as it only invites the party to make an offer and it is not intended to be binding. ix) In contract law consideration is required as an inducement to enter into a contract that is enforceable in the courts. It is an essential element for the formation of a contract. What constitutes sufficient consideration, however, has been the subject of continuing legal debate.
1) Was a Contract Formed? Offer - Definiteness & gap-fillers - Implied promise to negotiate in good faith - Ads - Firm offers - Revocation Acceptance - By promise: bilateral contracts - By performance: unilateral contracts - Notice - Subjective acceptance/Silence - Timeliness - Mailbox rule - Counter-offer/Qualified acceptance/Inquiry Consideration - Donative promises - Reliance issues - Bargain - Moral & past consideration - Illusory promises - Legal Duty - Accord & Satisfaction - Waivers - Implied by Fact - Implied by Law 2) Why Not Enforce? Problems with contract formation - Unconscionability
All of this happened one day before the FDA announcement that it was rejecting the drug. Merill Lynch and SEC began investigating this trade. Martha claimed that she had an agreement with her broker, Bacanovic, to sell the shares if the prices fell below $60 and claimed her innocence. Later during the trial, an expert witness testified that the ink used to make the notation about the $60 dollar agreement that Bacanovic provided was not the same as other ink on that paper. Martha claimed that she was worth $750 million and the loss of about $45,000 that she avoided was only a small fraction of her worth.
Two days after I sold the boat, it had a major engine breakdown. Legally by contract, I am not obligated to do a thing because the buyer signed an as is where is warranty condition disclaimer. Therefore, I am not legally bound to repair anything. However, I feel it is ethically right to help to assist with the repair. What about the opposite?