Ethical Decision Making Paper James Bush CJS/211 8/24/2015 Michael Raneses Ethical Decision Making According to my Ethics Awareness Inventory Scoring Summary I learned my ethical profile is most closely aligned with obligation. I base my ethical perspective on what is morally right. I believe that ethical conduct appeals to “conscience”. I look to whether a person’s intent rather the results of the action. We choose how we act and what rules to follow.
Meta ethics tries to make sense of the terms and concepts used in ethical theories such as Utilitarianism and Natural Law. Some people believe that ethical language is extremely meaningful as they argue it is essential to be able to define terms such as “good” and “bad” before we can even begin to discuss ethical theories. However others disagree with this and argue that moral statements are subjective so are meaningless, as they cannot be described as either true or false. Those who hold cognitive theories about ethical language would argue that ethical statements are not meaningless as they are about facts, and can therefore be proved true or false. Ethical Naturalism is a cognitive theory of meta ethics which holds the belief that
A person inherently has some sort of primitive worldview and code of personal ethics. Understanding, and in some cases coming to grips with, your worldview is important to understanding who you are and what you stand for in life. By knowing what makes you tick and why you act in certain ways is the first step on the journey to personal enlightenment and to creating a more secure sense of self and personal wellbeing. The following pages will establish the basis for my ethical worldview and discuss the development of my own ethical theory. Overview of Relevant Ethical Theories Virtue Ethics Virtue ethics was founded as it is known today by Plato and Aristotle, though
After almost 37 years, two journalists admitted that there was a scandal before the Post did and let it slip. Robert Smith, former Times reporter, says two months after the burglary, the acting director of the Federal Bureau of Investigator, L. Patrick Gray, disclosed explosive information about the case. If this is true, the New York Times missed a chance to get a great story in a generation. In conclusion, the Watergate scandal might be one of the greatest stories in a journalist career. It had an impact on practice of investigate journalist.
This is a legal but unethical issue. From this we can conclude that compliance ethics expects only the bare minimum, and to be a more ethical organisation, value ethics should be emphasized. Weaver and Trevino (1999) also believe that value ethics would have more of an impact and last longer in the organisation. Next is how formal culture systems promote ethics. Formal ethical systems consist of factors such as leadership, code of ethics, reward systems, orientation, and training programs.
Ron Sartena A few days ago, near perfect IQ Julian Assagn released secret government documents all pertaining to the Iraq, and Afghanistan war; there were nearly 400,000. All on his site wikileaks, Julian Assagn is now on the run after the biggest government hack in history. These "war logs" all give first hand accounts to what is actually going on in Iraq and Afghanistan, and sheds light to the amount of innocent blood lost. The reports detailed 109,032 deaths, comprised of 66,081 civilians, 23,984 "insurgent", they can label anyone as an insurgent, 15,196 iraqi government forces, and 3,771 freindlys. This means 31 civilians died every day over six years.
My decision is virtuous as the individual was creating an unsafe environment, and I was following a moral code. If I were to issue a citation for every circumstance, it would be seen as deontological ethics. Conclusion In conclusion, through the comparison and dissimilarities of the three theories one can gain further understanding of the importance that ethics and social responsibility. The similarities between the three theories represent the good in people, their strive for excellence and justification. The differences in the three theories begin with the ethics and morality.
In a sense, critical thinking is a form of analysis and determination of fact vs. fiction, identifying the unknown, coming to an understanding, etc… By taking the path of a critical thinker, a person develops a mental process of evaluation which helps to determine their ethical standards. By incorporating the critical thinking process into their mindset, it enables them to more effectively make decisions based upon truths and verified information, rather than unknowns and variables. By eliminating the variables, you bring to view the plain truths which exist and make a decision based upon that . Having a critical approach to ethical analysis is very important and remains one of the principle factors as far as I am concerned I think that people should have a very analytical mind if they are to be truly successful ethically, because it is too easy to forget and not care; resorting to self sufficient forms of thinking
For the sake of time and space, the definition of two interpreting educators is referenced. “… ethics (we will define as) behavioral standards – a set of principles that defines what is judged appropriate or inappropriate, right or wrong” (Alcorn & Humphrey, 2007, p.301). Because this particular situation is not specifically mentioned in the interpreting Code of Ethics, it is necessary for the interpreter to use their own personal morals and ethical judgment in order to decide which course of action or inaction to take. In order to make this decision, critical thinking is needed. A variety of viewpoints need to be considered, and there are steps to consider.
“The possession of knowledge carries an ethical responsibility.” Evaluate this claim. The right to study and possess knowledge is a fundamental right for every human which is enshrined in nearly every single country’s constitution. However, the decisions that are made when this knowledge is applied could potentially have repercussions. At this point, ethics becomes involved in the use of knowledge. In order to evaluate the claim that the possession of knowledge carries ethical responsibility, it is important to understand ethics and knowledge in the general sense To put it simply, ethics is moral philosophy, or rationalization of conduct as either right or wrong.