Macbeth and Batman share many similarities that surprisingly do not appeal to most individuals, most teacher or students would not even try to find a comparison between Batman and Macbeth because of the lack of ambition, but frankly there are many comparisons such as the influence of many dark supernatural forces that foresee chaos, also the hero to villain concept and the tragic past and privileged lives both Macbeth and Batman had. In the Macbeth there are many dark supernatural forces we see early in the play for example the three witches that Macbeth and Banquo encounter on the battlefield in act 1, scene 3, the witches represent evil and darkness in the book for example in act 1 scene 2 the witches tell Macbeth and Banquo that Macbeth will be king and Banquo’s children will be kings, by telling Macbeth and Banquo these prophecies it puts and idea in Macbeths minds that he should be king and helps him to initiate his assignation on king Duncan. In Batman the dark knight the “Joker” represent evil, chaos and anarchy, the Joker has no purpose in this movie but to create chaos in the city “Joker: Oh, you. You just couldn’t let me go, could you? This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object.
Another bad critique of Uglies is from Imaginary Books. Natalie Altish says, “ by the end of the book the concept of this dystopia wasn't as fresh anymore, and I ended up disliking Tally even more than I did in the beginning.” She shows she didn’t agree with the writing styles of Westerfeld. The various critiques show that many people can like the novel but also dislike how Westerfeld used a dystopian society to solve some of today’s current
Though Capote’s method of data gathering is questionable at best (authorial assertion comprises the sole proof of Capote’s fantastic memory that captures everything in an interview without a tape recorder), and the fact that a lot of his research was passed from witnesses to Harper Lee to the her notes and finally to Capote and his interpretation of these notes, it would still be inappropriate and unfounded to label his book a pure fiction; instead, we should modify his statement to say that everything in the book is factual to him. If anyone else had written the book, even using the same research and evidence that Capote used, the novel would read quite differently; the book as Perry’s personal memoir would also change it drastically; a first-person account of the effects of the murder on Holcomb by a member of the community would also have a different message. Yet all of these books, if executed properly, would be truthful: they all would just contain different truths, or different interpretations of the truth. Whether or not In Cold Blood is as factual as it contends to be, then, is an issue muddled by varying definitions of truth. The problem lies in a definition of
It was bulky and colorless, therefore not aesthetically pleasing. The artist used a concept that had been done many times before and will be done many times again. To be completely honest, the piece was boring. My personal favorite piece, Hide and Seek, though I am partial to it, I do not believe is canonical art either. The fact is, most modern art, which is what these pieces are, is not canonical.
The end of the world is also definitely not wanted and supposed to happen. In the story, “By The Waters Of Babylon,” Stephen Vincent Benet argues that history repeats itself, which causes the reader to be aware of what happened in the past and not make it happen again. One of the worst things in history that’s happened was the
There is no room for books in her life, and she ends up turning Montag in to the authorities. She is the perfect example of a mindless drone without individuality or feeling. Fahrenheit 451 is an example of a dystopian society. Individuality, reading, and intelligence aren’t accepted in society. Brown says, “As a result, society has become vapid, more interested in mindless entertainment than knowledge, understanding, and critical thought, and the ability to discern between two fundamental documents has no place.” Taking literature away did not make all people the same; it just made them without thoughts and feelings of their
Story Critique: Kindred I picked up Kindred by Octavia E. Butler because time travel fascinates me, but one thing that detracted from Kindred in my mind was the way it almost was as if Butler could not decide whether it was a science fiction or historical fiction novel. The time travel premise immediately attracts the science fiction title, but the carefully researched history was what made the novel excel. In fact, Dana's time travel was never justified or explained; no one, including Dana, questioned why she suddenly traveled a century into the past. However, it was interesting to see how modern Dana deals with living as a pseudo-slave for months at a time, carrying with her the 20th century knowledge and beliefs. One scene in the book
Ericsson defines omission as “Telling most of the truth minus one or two key facts whose absence changes the story completely” (Ericsson 2), since I told my teacher I finished the project, but not that I didn’t do it correctly nor that I didn’t read a book. Everything I discussed in this essay while all different examples of lying, were still lies discussed in Stephanie Ericsson’s short essay called “The Ways We Lie”. If there’s ever any valuable knowledge within an essay that was the most knowledgeable essay I’ve ever read. It clearly states the different type of lies even lies that you’d probably never guess were lies. Works
The credentials for this article by standard are really low and unusable. Cal Berkley gives no citations as an agreeable standard of terms to use in debate and competition. It does not show when this article was published but it is not in any good condition to use anyway. Yes if I could find a way to scrap little tiny important details from this I would. But there just aren’t any in here worth looking for at
This book is actually banned from some schools in the United States. In finish if I had the choice of not reading it I wouldn’t, 1) it is inappropriate, rude disrespectful. 2) A flaw about me is if it doesn’t really interest me or it doesn’t affect me I don’t care to read or learn because after this I will forget about and never pay attention to it again. One day it might change but this boo had no affect on me nor did it change my perspective on first nation’s