He was very critical of the courts lifestyle which made him appear to look superior to the Royalists and this was furthered by his daughter’s marriage to Charles’s brother to which many Royalists became jealous over his influence and strength in position, increasing their dislike of Clarendon. His method of land settlement also upset some Royalists because it meant that those who had sold their land during the interregnum wouldn’t be refunded. Their resentment at this treatment also was to cause problem with Parliament later. He also played a key role in Charles' marriage to Catherine of Braganza and her failure to bear children was also damaging to Clarendon, as he was accused of marrying Charles to an infertile bride for personal gain as his grandchild would become the next heir. These factors all upset the royalists and meant they had negative opinions of Clarendon which they were able to whisper in Charles’s ear when Clarendon wasn’t around and turn Charles’s more against Clarendon so it became easier to dismiss him and use him as a scapegoat later on.
APUSH, Period 5 13 November 2013 Consanguinity (DBQ #2) The relationships and interactions between the Native Americans and the English were very complex and delicate. Often times they started out very friendly but over time they changed to very hostile and aggressive relations. The English wanted land and resources and the Natives wanted their land back. When these two forces met with a conflict there was almost always death and bloodshed. Due to the excessive amount of conflicts, it was inevitable not to have battles, peace agreements, and to this day Native Americans are not pleased with Caucasian people.
It was very difficult for the Irish to deal with on top of all the other hardships they were coping with. The Protestant Americans were extremely against accepting the Catholic Irish as a faith in their country. This idea only continued the separation and isolation the Irish as a culture faced. To escape this inevitable persecution, “Many changed their accents, names and even religion to escape discrimination. Others turned to alcohol and crime.
Not only did the British people not want many thousands of men going to war with the Irish, the press and the USA were horrified by the situation and it was giving Britain and DLG a bad name. In order to ensure peace, DLG proposed a peace
Americans were so tired of the war that the feelings were reflected in the election of Johnson vs Nixon. When the President put in affect the draft many of the young adults did not agree. These young adults did not want to go to war and would protest not to go. In the United States all the people were getting upset and no longer wanted the war overseas or here in the US. Americans no longer would look at war the same
Secondly, rental costs of shop units are also higher there. Finally, there are fewer shop units in Bellport. I recommend about opening a new branch in Bellport. The company will be able to recruit staff easily and will be able to attract a large of customers. It will benefit from cheaper transportation costs from their warehouse.
This is because although they were successful it created major problems for Heaths government and even those who succeeded them. The continuous miners strikes led to Heath pulling tough measures, which included the three-day week. This is because the government didn’t want to just give into the miners and in the contrast Heath wanted to defeat them by limiting ‘the use of electricity to three specified days per week’-Heath. However this restrictive measure led to a significant uproar, as it was similar to the austerities, which ordinary people had experienced from the war such as people not having heating, unable to cook and sitting by candlelight. This shows that the ordinary people didn’t gain anything from the unrest in 1973/4 as it caused major inconveniences in the home highlighting that it was an issue.
The reason for this was that England was overpopulated both with homeless or extremely poor people and their prisons were too working over their capacity. In America they found an opportunity to start over and redeem themselves. In England there was only one religion, the English religion, if someone were not to follow it they would surely be prosecuted. Because of this a great deal of people wanted to escape the religious oppression they faced in England and went to America where they could “do more service to the Lord”. At the time people were also discontent with the political system instated in England, this being a Unitary Parliamentary Monarchy.
The new taxes that were imposed on baptism, burial and marriage were resented by many of the commons as a great number, particularly the poorer people, could not afford to pay them and they feared that this would prevent their salvation. Source B suggests that Robert Aske led the uprising in an attempt to prevent or reduce the ‘rising entry-fines and new taxes’. Source B also states that the ‘nobles and gentry disliked… the Statute of Uses’. This was an Act of Parliament which limited the application of uses in property law and had been introduced by Henry as a way for him to rectify his financial issues, so perhaps (as Source B suggests) the nobles had helped to lead the rebellion in an attempt to revert this
German immigrants faced discrimination based on ideology, geography, and religion. As they attempted to find their new way of life, they frequently experienced discrimination in housing, education, and employment. The discrimination experienced also led to a “glass ceiling” that prevented them from advancing in the workforce. They were socially unaccepted because of their affiliation with drinking and politically faced with prejudice because of their opposition to prohibition. Germans opposed prohibition not only because of their fondness of liquor, but also because they had a strong hand in the manufacture of