These are the automatically computed results of your exam. Grades for essay questions, and comments from your instructor, are in the "Details" section below. | Date Taken: | 11/16/2014 | Time Spent: | 2 h , 37 min , 35 secs | Points Received: | 68 / 75 (90.7%) | | Question Type: | # Of Questions: | # Correct: | Multiple Choice | 8 | 7 | Essay | 2 | N/A | | | Grade Details - All Questions | Question 1. | Question : | (TCO B) In which of the following situations may taxpayers file as married filing jointly? (Becker CPA Review Course) | | | Student Answer: | | Taxpayers who were married but lived under a legal separation agreement at the end of the year.
Is there anything unsatisfactory about it? Could it have been improved upon in some way? Cost-benefit analysis is a legitimate tool, by using the lowest cost to obtain the biggest profit out of it. However, it is unacceptable to sacrifice human life in exchange of paying a lower production costs. Before they made any decision, they should hold an ethical meeting about the improvement of fuel tank, if they would change their mind by paying more then people would not have to die.
Subsection 2f is extensive in describing unlawful termination as race, colour, sex, sexual preference, age, physical or mental disability, marital status, family responsibilities, pregnancy, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin (Fair Work Act, 2009, p.1988). Under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) it is important to note that there is a specialist information and assistance group which have been established within the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman for small and medium sized employers to gain assistance and advice when considering forms of dismissal. In conclusion unlawful dismissal is for certain prohibited reasons such as discrimination, etc, as stated above. An employee’s performance issues or misconduct by and large, encompass unfair dismissals. The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) sheds some light on the disparity to ensure employees and employers are protected when claims are submitted.
Davey Jones could also argue misrepresentation—he was induced to enter into the contract based on representations made about the quality of the ship. There appears to be no evidence of fraudulent intent. As a result, Davey Jones will have to plead either innocent or negligent misrepresentation. Since he appears to want to cancel the contract, he can plead either innocent or negligent misrepresentation. If he claims fraudulent misrepresentation and is unsuccessful, then Davey Jones will likely have to pay Captain Jack Sparrow Inc. its full legal costs.
Week 5 Knowledge Check Score: 13/17 Concepts Mastery Questions Control Process 100% 1 2 3 17 Feedforward/Concurre nt/Feedback Controls 100% 4 5 6 Financial Controls 67% 7 8 9 Balanced Scorecard 50% 10 11 12 13 Benchmarking 67% 14 15 16 Concept: Control Process Concepts Mastery Questions Control Process 100% 1 2 3 17 1.The control process assumes that ________. employees require clear directions from management A. employees are underqualified and require training B. specific goals for performance were already created during the planning process C. employee monitoring costs are part and parcel of doing business D. The correct answer is: C. Because the control process measures actual performance against standards, these Correct!standards should already be in place when the control process begins. If standards are not created during the planning process, the control process will not have a goal against which to measure actual performance. 2.An example of control criteria that can be used in any situation is ________. A. number of calls taken per day B. employee satisfaction C. average time to process paperwork D. client requests completed per hour The correct answer is: B.
The CERCLA Windfall Lien: A Liability Trap for Unwary Purchasers of Contaminated Sites By Larry Schnapf The Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2002 (the “2002 Brownfield Amendments”) added a Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser (“BFPP”) defense to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) . The BFPP defense allows purchaser to knowingly take title to contaminated property provided they satisfy certain criteria but comes with an important hitch. Namely, EPA may perfect a “windfall lien” on property owned by a BFPP in certain circumstances to recover cleanup costs. This article will discuss the scope of this lien, the recent EPA guidance that discusses when the
Question #1 John v. Gilbert Gilbert’s argument was that lottery ticket was his and he did not mean to throw it away. While Johns argument is that when he found it that it was abandoned property which is property which the owner has voluntarily parted with and has no intention of recovering it. Once Gilbert threw the ticket out Gilbert forfeit his ownership of it. It also means that the finder i.e. John can claim title that is superior to that of any other person including the true owner i.e.
The tortfeasor’s act was the proximate cause of injuries or damages. Damages were incurred. (Textbook p.150) ANALYSIS The fact remain that there was an accident, an injury occurred from the accident and negligence was evident. Officer Ruthless was negligent but was justified in the decision. He had to uphold the curfew law.
Under California law, trespass to chattels "lies where an intentional interference with the possession of personal property has proximately caused injury." (Thrifty-Tel, Inc. v. Bezenek (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 1559, 1566, 54 Cal.Rptr.2d 468, italics added.) In cases of interference with possession of personal property not amounting to conversion, "the owner has a cause of action for trespass or case, and may recover only the actual damages suffered by reason of the impairment of the property or the loss of its use." (Zaslow v. Kroenert, supra, 29 Cal.2d at p. 551, 176 P.2d 1, italics added; accord, Jordan v. Talbot (1961) 55 Cal.2d 597, 610, 12 Cal.Rptr. 488, 361 P.2d 20.)
(1)Quantity of Libras Demanded (billions) | (2)Dollar Price of Libras | (3)Quantity of Libras Supplied (billions) | 100200300400 | $5432 | 32520010075 | The equilibrium dollar price of libras is | | | Student Answer: | | $5. | | | | $4. | | | | $3. | | | | $2. | | Instructor Explanation: | Chapter 38 | | | | Points Received: | 1 of 1 | | Comments: | | | | 7.