Was the 1905 Revolution an Actual Revolution?

1509 Words7 Pages
Why did the 1905 revolution fail? Revolution: A fundamental change in power or organisational structure which takes place over a short period of time. The 1905 revolution is Russia, was not largely successful. Historians attribute this to four main factors; Concessions, repressions, the weakness of those who were trying to rebel, and the skepticism and debate over whether there truly was a revolution in 1905. The absence of a real leader, any political overthrow and a change from autocracy to democracy is the key reasons i believe that there was not in fact a revolution, however a cluster of spontaneous uprisings, at unplanned instances for the most part. To begin, I believe the first reason why the 1905 revolution failed was due to the concessions made by Nicholas II. In October 1905, Tsar Nicholas II released a manifesto, alongside the consultation of Sergei Witte. This manifesto entitled the Russian civilians to more human rights, and the ability to vote in the Duma, a legislative body for the people to vote on. This manifesto was issued before the revolters could gain any real momentum and being a coup d'etat. This quashed any threat of a revolt and stopped the threat of an overthrow of the tsar. This was a key reason as to why the 1905 revolution stoped. However this manifesto did little to solve the problems which faced Russia, as the decisions made by the duma, irrelevant to the pecentage of voters in favour, could instantaneously be vetoed and ignored by the Autocrat in power, therefore remaining in Sovereignty. Leon Trotsky, a marxist revolutionist and theorist described it as "A constitution has been given, but the Autocracy remains." This statement shows just how the opposition viewed it, although the granting of human rights was enough for a lot of people, such as the liberal party named the Octobrists, gaining the name from the agreement of the
Open Document