To What Extent Did Soviet Culture Perform a Political Role in the Ussr in the Years 1924 - 1953?

1976 Words8 Pages
To what extent did Soviet culture perform a political role in the USSR in the years 1924-1953? Culture can be considered any mediums of expression with a creative aspect, which represent the emotions and opinions of the public. There are many types of culture, and the main ones are art, literature, cinema, theatre and music. In a democratic society, it expresses the opinions of the majority about the government and other important organisations, with a clear emphasis on free speech and is controlled and regulated by the bottom of society. However, after 1924, the USSR was a clear dictatorship, which meant that the culture was controlled by the élite and is used to portray the elite positively. There is no denying that culture performed a political role in the USSR in this time period, as culture is heavily effected by politics and vice versa, and so in this essay, I will be evaluating the extent to which Soviet culture performed a political role in the USSR in the years 1924-1953. Art performed a highly political role in the USSR in the years 1924-1953. In the early years of the Bolshevik state, experimental and abstract art was allowed under Lenin. This all changed however with the change in leadership after 1929 and the emergence of Stalin as the ‘vozhd’. Stalin saw the arts as an expression of society’s values, and thus the creation of a new socialist state required a simultaneous cultural revolution. In 1930, Stalin expressed his discontent with Soviet art, arguing that revolutionary art should express government opinion rather than individual creativity. This led to the establishing of the ‘All-Union Co-operative of Workers in Representational Arts’, which set targets as to the number of works of art an artist was expected to produce and the subject matter they were expected to tackle. In 1936, the party further tightened its grip on artists, setting up the
Open Document