Theories of Learning and Their Implications for the Classroom.

1439 Words6 Pages
THEORIES OF LEARNING AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CLASSROOM Concept | Summary | Leading Theorists | Views of Learning Process | Implications for Teaching | Implications for Learning | Examples | Behaviourism | Classical Conditioning:Stimulus + Response = behavioural changeAn unconditioned stimulus (UCS) generates an unconditioned response (UCR). If the UCS is reinforced by a secondary stimulus a conditioned response can amount (CR), resulting in the UCS becoming a conditioned stimulus (CS) for future events.The CR can become generalised to similar stimuli e.g. maths tests and chemistry tests may both promote anxiety about failing.However it is also possible to cause the CR to become extinct – if the CS occurs often enough without the presence of the UCS then this causes the CR to be diminished over time. (Eggen et al, 2013)Operant Conditioning:Behavioural change due to consequence, which can be enhanced by external reinforcement – positive or negativePremack Principle – a more desired activity can help with the performance of a less desired activity.Shaping – behaviour can be moulded towards the desired form with selected reinforcers. (Eggen et al, 2013)In summary classical conditioning causes a person to produce an existing response to a new stimuli whereas operant conditioning allows them to learn new responses as a consequence to said stimuli (Sammons, 2009).It is possible that behavioural based learning can be enhanced by a community of practice. When people feel a part of something and acquire a sense of belonging this can create a positive environment for productivity and learning. | Classical Conditioning:Pavlov – Salivating DogHere is a YouTube link demonstrating this experiment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhqumfpxuzI(bullyingnewsvideos, 2008)Operant Conditioning:Skinner – Pecking PigeonsHere is a YouTube link of this experiment:

More about Theories of Learning and Their Implications for the Classroom.

Open Document