What we don’t think about is the fact that most medical and quite a few technological advancements evolved because of war. Another fact is that, although it’s hard to believe, but war makes countries use their resources better, or at least find better ways to use them. Think about it, most countries try to win wars and to do that, you need to be better than the people that you are fighting, so we use our resources better. Another thing, without war, we might not have certain medical advancements at our disposal; such as penicillin, hydrogen peroxide, and antiseptics. Life would be a lot harder if these things had never been created, wouldn’t it?
We are more likely to consult other world powers to justify our reasons for going to war. A just war today, for civilized countries, have to have approval from the United Nations. An argument about the guidelines that St. Thomas Aquinas had suggested is now it is considered too subjective. "What constitutes a just cause is in the eyes of the beholder, as are the probability of success and any estimate of likely costs and benefits." (Haass, 2009) If war is the only answer to save lives, yes it is justifiable not matter the time or the place.
These are two ideas that turned to war and could have been solved without force. These wars are unnecessary and need to be prevented and or stopped to make the world a better place and it would also make peace again. Peace is the thing we need to shoot for but many need to understand the reason why. Then again these wars are unwinnable because a conclusion will not be reached no matter how hard we try. The only way we can stop it is by being smart about our future decisions and hope to god that whatever decisions get made don’t ruin our country’s fate
The use of force is not necessary to gain the cooperation of sources, as prisoners are more likely to cooperate when they feel a sense of trust and respect. Using torture as a means of reducing local threats has proven not to work. Knowing that they will be subject to humiliation and physical abuse makes insurgents fight harder to avoid capture and has increased their dislike for American Forces. It can result in retaliatory acts against our own
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” The American public should refrain from gaining any negative or unauthorized influences by the military-industrial complex. The people should fight the military spending. Everything is eventually going to fail and be a disaster if power is given to the wrong people. The term MIC became widespread because of how it fit with what was going on with the military at the time. In American history, military spending was never high and consistent and now it was finally occurring.
Stanza six and seven tell readers the reason about his feeling towards Crazy Horse. In Custer’s mind, Crazy Horse was the same as him—a brave, born warrior and leader for wars. He thought maybe Crazy Horse was better than him. The fact proved that Custer’s worry was reasonable. Crazy Horse’s forces didn’t have advanced arms, but he had better wisdom and tactics of war.
While assuming JIB to be true, Shelton wages war on the government and by extension those who support it. He views this as a last resort, since he watched all the other non-violent options fail him. Thus this war can be justified. Shelton is justified in his actions because he is redressing a wrong suffered, and his intentions are to rid the corruptness from the judicial system. The people that Shelton killed are considered combatants because they support they governmental system and work with it.
With the Balance of Power destabilising, which, according to Thucydides, is the only means to achieve peace, the growth of power in Athens caused the Spartans to feel more and more insecure and thus they started to prepare to defend themselves. This very much reflects the realist point of view, as it argues that without a Balance of Power there can be no peace and it also shows how easily the balance can be dis-rupted so that it causes a war. Thucydides that war may be justified on grounds of pursuit of the national interest and in order to achieve peace at last. However, there are differences as to what is a ‘legitimate’ national interest. Where for political realism everything that is in the interest of the state and can be achieved by
Furthermore, militarization in the area is not meant as an act of aggression but merely effective enforcement, as sovereign countries have the right to protect their land; the military manifestation and coast guard is present for policing purpose, they have a similar role to the RCMP on mainland. Ullman goes on to argue that this prizefight for resources will pose further problems not only for the United States but also the international community (Ullman, 1983, 141). This struggle for resources will be tested even further as our population continues to grow rapidly. Ullman predicts that all these factors will take a turn for the worse in a terrible chain of events (Ullman, 1983, 141-142). Overpopulation will quickly take over government agendas as they struggle to allocate resources; this will be the dawning of revolutions.
Being stronger, faster, tougher: superhuman does not mean that the right to privacy does not exist, and if it is necessary, let war be the judge! Fight for the freedom every superhuman deserves. Fight for the common good. Fight not for the thrill of war, but for freedon - a reason far more valuable than anyone could imagine. We must stand strong and prove to others that we are not mere weapons without emotions and meant for war, but human beings with gifts entrusted upon us, and extirpate the false accusations..