Tanglewood Case 3

1295 Words6 Pages
Recruiting Like many retailers, Tanglewood has high recruiting needs in entry level positions due to a high rate of turnover. Tanglewood’s current recruiting methods vary from one region to the next. By assessing these various methods and comparing their overall effectiveness, we have a good opportunity to improve the recruiting process, thus optimizing the operations of this organization. We will review the target demographics, and look into the methodology of each region’s present recruitment styles. The desire to create a unified recruiting process will be reviewed and evaluated, with an ultimate goal of devising a functional, efficient and profitable recruiting service for this organization. First let us review the recruitment guide below. Position: Store Associate Reports to: Shift Leaders and/or Department Manager Qualifications: All considered Relevant labor market: Various regions of the Pacific Northwest Timeline: Continuous recruiting Activities to undertake to source well-qualified candidates: Local and Regional newspaper advertisement Company Web site posting Employee referrals Job service agency Outside recruiting agency Job fairs Staff members involved: V.P. Human Resources, HR Recruiting Manager(s), Assistant Store Manager(s), Department Manager(s) Budget: $2,500-6,500 Open Recruiting vs. Targeted Recruiting Open recruiting allows for the widest cast of the net in the available applicant pool. This method allows for equal opportunities for all potential job applicants; however it may yield less than satisfactory results. Unfortunately when permitting anyone to apply for a position it does not ensure qualified candidacy. Larger numbers of applicants tend to apply for positions in open recruiting making it more challenging to sift through the information to locate the more qualified applicants. Targeted recruiting permits

More about Tanglewood Case 3

Open Document