Social Stratification Essay

666 Words3 Pages
Functionalist and Marxist Perspectives on Social Stratification Social stratification refers to the presence of distinct social groups which are ranked one above the other in terms of factors such as prestige and wealth (Haralambos & Holborn, 2004). Those who belong to a particular group or stratum will have some awareness of common interests and a common identity. They also share a similar lifestyle which, to some extent, will distinguish them from members of other social strata (Lenski, 1984). Social stratification involves a hierarchy of social groups and they either enjoy or suffer the unequal distribution of rewards in society as members of different social groups. Four principles are identified which help explain why social stratification exists. First, social stratification is a characteristic of society and not merely of individuals. Second, social stratification is universal but variable. Third, it persists over generations and fourth, it is supported by patterns of belief. There are different sociological perspectives which have been put forward about social stratification; the Functionalists and the Marxists. A Functionalist, (Parsons, 1954 in Haralambos & Holborn, 2004), has argued that stratification systems derive from common values. He proposes that those who perform successfu Social stratification refers to a class concept in which individuals are classified into “groups based on shared socio-economic conditions” (Shepard, 2004, p. 67). In contemporary western societies, social stratification is organized in terms of three layers namely, the upper class, the middle class, and the lower class. These classifications are unique to state-based societies rather than feudal societies which are characterized by nobility-to-peasant relations. This paper focuses on Karl Marx and Max Weber’s explanations of social stratification. Karl Marx
Open Document