Jackie Wade Feb. 11, 2015 Primary and Secondary historical sources can be identified based on varying factors. However, they may both be beneficial to the reader depending on the purpose of ones research. Primary and Secondary sources differentiate in three major ways: the time period in which the source was written, the author, and the dialogue within the source. A prime example of a primary versus secondary source would be “The Massachusetts Bay Colony Case Against Anne Hutchinson (1637)” versus “Anne Hutchinson versus Massachusetts”. “The Massachusetts Bay Colony Case Against Anne Hutchinson (1637)” being the primary source, while “Anne Hutchinson versus Massachusetts” being the secondary source, due to three of many differentiating factors.
Fayol vs Mintzberg, who is right? The theoretical models of management presented by Henri Fayol and Henry Mintzberg respectively, bear clear and striking differences in how they explain the “changing nature of management and leadership”(Brooks, 2009). To argue whether the image displayed by Fayol is superior to that of Mintzberg I will examine the strengths and weaknesses of the differing models and compare, as well as with the opinions of other theorists. This will allow me to conclude which image is superior and in what senses the descriptions of management established by Mintzberg are ineffective. In this essay I will argue that while it is clear that the concepts of Fayol have been largely superseded by modern descriptive views such as those of Mintzberg and Kotter, he laid out the foundations so to speak (remove this) that allowed modern thinkers to develop their theories in greater detail.
The author used contrast, exaggeration, analogy and so on. I will not list all here but some important and common ones. First, also the most important, is the contrast. The author used different contrasting patterns to stand out his opinion. Just like the phrase “not yet” appeared in several sentences in paragraph 2 and 4.
‘The comparison of two texts in terms of how the contexts of each shape form and meaning necessarily involves consideration of key perceptions into the human condition they offer?’ When we compare two texts, consideration is given to the effect of context and how it shapes form besides meaning. To what extent has this been your experience in your study? The context affects the differences in the meaning and form between two texts. It is evident in Jane Austen’s 1816 novel Persuasion and 1998 film Shakespeare in Love directed by John Madden. The 1998 film is set in the Elizabethan times despite the modernity of the form.
Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution vs. Declaration of Rights from the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Abstract There are many commonalities and subtle differences between the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution and the Declarations of Rights of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The main differences lie in the specificity of the wording by the Commonwealth when laying out their provisions in their Declaration of Rights. Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution vs. Declaration of Rights from the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania This paper will compare and contrast two amendments in the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Rights from the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
This quote contains advanced vocabulary that requires higher education to understand. In “Separation of the Classes” the author, Charles Murray, Another differing attribute of these two articles was the tone. In Murray’s
You may also have to discuss which points of view are missing from the given documents. Since the DBQ focuses on historical skills within a world history framework, remember to place documents chronologically, culturally, and thematically. You're not expected to know the author or topic of all the DBQ documents, or to include information outside of the documents. Continuity and Change-Over-Time Essay The Continuity and Change-Over-Time Essay focuses on large global issues such as technology, trade, culture, migrations, or biological developments. It covers at least one of the periods in the course outline and one or more cultural areas.
This article also brought up an interesting question stating “Do translators imbue their work with temporal signifiers, those that don't stand out as readily as "dude"?” This question brings about the question of whether the responsibility of interpreting these terms should be put on the reader or the translator. Another interesting point I read in this article is about how difficult it is translating from
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS Introduction Lloyd Bitzer defines a rhetorical situation specifically as “a complex of persons, events, objects, and relations presenting an actual or potential exigence which can be completely or partially removed if discourse, introduced into the situation, can so constrain human decision or action as to bring about the significant modification of the exigence(105).” A rhetorical situation can be described as someone or something trying to get you to do something without directly telling you, but implying it. Every rhetorical situation has an exigence, rhetors, audience, and constraints. Grant-Davie describes a rhetor as the author, the exigence as a problem or need that can be addressed by communication, and the audience
Each author’s method in integrating the oral history may be different and, to some degree, inadequate, but the presence of oral accounts in their essays give voice to different perspectives of that time. It is evident, then, that altogether the oral history in each essay holds value and plays a significant role in the integrity of each argument. We must be careful, however, to fully accept the perspectives and arguments the author presents to us as definitively as any individual identity in any historical account, including the author, has the power to misinterpret and miscommunicate historical accounts accidently or