Without this knowledge, Jane Doe gave what she believed was her informed consent for the surgery, which consequently violated her right to self-determination and did her extreme harm rather than good. She never had the chance to explore other options, because she was misinformed about her donor from the start. In addition to hiding risks from the patient, physicians gave her little alternative to her procedure. She knew she did not want a high risk donor, in fact she had “previously rejected another donor “because of his lifestyle”’(Vaughn 152). Clearly Jane Doe was exercising her autonomous right to decline this kidney, as she thought accepting that kidney may cause her more harm than good.
301 Task B Case study You are a social care worker and a service user, Hannah, tells you that she is unhappy taking her new medication as she thinks she does not need it and so she is throwing it away. You know from her care plan that Hannah does need to take the medication regularly and gets confused. Hannah begs you to keep this confidential and not tell anyone especially her daughter, who she sees regularly, as her daughter will be very angry. Bi) How would you explain the term ‘confidentiality’ to Hannah? I will be straight forward and honest with Hannah, i will tell her that i can not keep secret and that it is in her best interest that relevant people should be told in order to resolve the issue with her new medication.
Assignment 301 Principles of communication in adult social care settings Task A Short answer questions You are a social care worker and a service user, Hannah, tells you that she is unhappy taking her new medication. She thinks she does not need it and so she is throwing it away. You know from her care plan Hannah does need to take her medication requarly and gets confused. Hannah begs you to keep this confidential and not tell anyone especially her daughter, who she sees requarly, as her daughter will be very angry. Bi) How would you explain the term ‘confidentiality’ to Hannah?
In the treatment of Miss E, it will be vital to isolate the reasons for her overeating in order to help her through the process of hypnosis. Working in hypnosis, we must work with the client’s particular issue, that is, the underlying reason or reasons for weight gain and the inability to loose it. This must not be done by depriving the clients as this will not serve to address the issue, but more the reprogramming of the subconscious into eating properly and taking pride in themselves, almost to endeavour to recreate a healthy relationship with food. It will be the process of replacing the satisfaction or comfort that food gives to the individual with something that gives as much emotional
Additionally, he had a legal document, an advance directive, explicitly stating he did not want to be placed on a ventilator or receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation. By placing Mr. E on a ventilator Dr. K chose to ignore his wishes and is committing a violation of ethics. The nurse caring for Mr. E did not perform her duty as advocate for this patient as well as failing to communicate the client’s choices to other members of the healthcare team, primarily the attending physician, Dr. K, and the patient’s family. There are many implications of her neglect. Mr. E’s family is placed in a situation in which they must essentially choose life or death for him.
The reddened area on Mr. J’s back should have been reported to the RN for further assessment. This intervention by the CNA could keep Mr. J from getting a pressure ulcer and the RN assessment would have included a turning schedule to relieve pressure over bony spots. Ideally the patient would have not been placed back into the same position to be restrained, this just compounding the damage to his already fragile skin. In accordance with his religion his diet reflected a kosher meat preference. For an old man with mild dementia this is something he must rely on the staff for as he may not be able to recognize the mistakes made with his food, especially with changes in the consistency or presentation of his meal.
The health professionals have only addressed the physical injuires that have resulted from her insulin shock, and not the main problem of educating her on how to stop this from occurring again. Therefore, physiotherapists and dieticians should discuss and check her health condition before she left the rehab centre. Further, Jenny`s living situation should also be considered. Clients and their family and carers may be invited to additional meetings to share the team`s knowledge and plan for future management (Portsmouth, Coyle & Trede, 2008, p231). such as, alter her living condition to place her in a safer environment.
205 b case studies. Bi – The difficulties with that situation would be to convince mrs ahmed that the foods she wants to eat will make her diabetes worse, the next one would be if she insist to would be best to get foods she wants that have less risk and wouldn’t affect her diabetes, she has the right to choose as she’s her own person but you could reassure her what could happen, but she can make decisions herself. One dilemma would be mrs ahmed could complain that you’re not giving her any food. Bii – you can seek advice from her doctor or perhaps you can ask the doctor to ask Mrs ahmed of the consequences of eating foods that are not suitable for her medical conditional and seek advice from your manager, supervisor, local library to research
They would also argue that the only way to prevent infection was using chlorinated baths and dousing a resident with the antibiotic, sulfanymde. The principles of Beneficence were also neglected when Dax asked the nurses to assist him in dying, a nurses responsibility is to advocate for the patient. The nurses should have made it clear to the physicians that the patient’s pain was not relieved and the patient wished to die, but to do so the nurses may have felt they were neglecting the non-maleficence principle by refraining from killing him. Non-maleficence is ceasing from doing harm. The physicians also neglected this perspective by not treating his pain they also assisted in causing him more physical and emotional suffering (4).
As the sole provider in your household, your family depends on you. What do you do? I would warn everybody that has bought the formula that the formula is contaminated and that they are not to use the formula anymore and if I do not tell the people about the formula the people will continue to use the formula and their babies will be sick and they still can sue us for that because we knew about the situation and we just could have just started telling them when we found out that the formula was contaminated and avoid getting sued either way. After reviewing my answers to both questions I did not use similar answers or anything my conclusion on both my morals is that you should try to save as many people as possible and let people know if there is any type of contamination going on with the food or formula that has been bought from a