Pathetic Fallacy In El Marsh House

453 Words2 Pages
Why did Susan Hill choose to pick El Marsh House as the main scene and how did she use pathetic fallacy to make the writing effective? In my personal opinion I believe that Susan Hill used El Marsh House as the main scene in the book because she can make it sound like a mystery. She can twist a house that she maybe has seen in her life a turned it to make a mysterious haunted house. Later within the book it starts to get into great detail on describing what Arthur Kipps had witnesses, felt and heard. “Whatever was about, whoever I had seen, and heard rocking, and who had passed me by just now, whoever had opened the locked door was not ‘real’. No. but what was ‘real’? At that moment I began to doubt my own reality.” This quote shows that this mysterious woman who seems to be haunting this particular house. By…show more content…
“There was a touch of warmth in the autumn sunshine, and what few trees I saw, all bent a little away from the prevailing wind. Still had a few last russet and golden leaves clinging on to the ends of their branches” this is meaning that the nice autumn feeling you get from the change from summer makes it so easy to describe. Golden leaves suggest that the leaves are now changing colour because of the season change and so the leaves will eventually fall. This will have an effect on the reader because they will be able to imagine the scene and what mood it is trying to make you feel. However…further on in that paragraph it says what Arthur Kipps imagined it would have been like. “How drear and grey and bleak the place would be in the dank, rain and mist, how beaten and battered at days on end by those gales that came sweeping across the flat, open country, how completely cut off by blizzards” He thought of it as the complete opposite to what it actually is. Rain and mist makes it sound mysterious and depressing. He seems like a dark person in this

More about Pathetic Fallacy In El Marsh House

Open Document