Oh, the Hum-Enides: the Fate of Clytaemnestra

1251 Words6 Pages
Morgan Kalka Prof. Brunt HON 2301 2 Dec. 2014 Oh, the Hum-enides: The Fate of Clytaemnestra Clytaemnestra receives no justice by the end of Eumenides; she is abandoned, both by conceptual justice and by the Furies themselves, newly taken into Athens. But this abandonment is a wonderful and essential thing for the Athenian people. (Justice, for reference, here means legal pursuit of the objective moral truth, while pity might here be equated with sympathy.) Her fate is absolutely that of a victim. She makes valid points, as do the Furies on her behalf. Their main point goes like this: If the murder of one’s husband deserves vengeance, the murder of one’s mother should also deserve vengeance. And if one is killed for the former, one should be killed for the latter. And, says Athena to the Furies after the trial, “You were not defeated - / the vote was tied, a verdict fairly reached / with no disgrace to you[.]” (267.806-808). They had managed to convince six of the twelve Athenian jurists. But Athena’s vote tipped the scales in favor of Orestes – against Clytaemnestra. So the Furies’ arguments are essentially for naught. Clytaemnestra makes no gains and wins no rewards following the trial; emotionally, she may very well be in a worse state than she was before. Consider what she says to the Furies shortly before the trial: “I go stripped of honour, thanks to you / along among the dead.... / I wander in disgrace, I feel the guilt, I tell you, / withering guilt from all the outraged dead!” (235.99-104). Her suffering does not end with the dropping of the final curtain. In the end, Clytaemnestra fails to do anything of importance to herself. (It’s true that she causes the trial to unfold, but this does not benefit her at all.) She is, understandably but not pitiably, miserable. Why does Clytaemnestra not deserve any pity? One might make the case that, at the very
Open Document