Oedipus Rex- the Perfect Tragedy

1729 Words7 Pages
Justin Parlato Scott Satterfield AP Literature November 22, 2012 Oedipus Rex: the Perfect Tragedy Aristotle professed that tragedy was a greater story than history, for history showed what simply was, and tragedy showed what could be. Oedipus Rex, written by Sophocles, is an example of what constitutes a perfect tragedy, as defined by Aristotle. Itʼs plot is completely self contained, with a chain of events that follow each other in clear order. Aristotle believed that the hero of every tragedy should be a highly ranked member of society, who has a hamartia, or fatal flaw, leading to his own downfall. The hero will inevitably go through a tragic reversal- or peripeteia- in which he does something to produce the opposite effect of what was intended, followed by the catharsis- a moment of clarity where the hero realizes his own doom, and is purged from emotions after being so overwhelmed. The audience should be able to empathize with the character is this scene. Oedipus the King contains a self-contained plot with a unity of action, as well as an dramatic peripeteia and anagnorisis, and a grand hero who brings about his own downfall through his tragic flaw; making it the perfect model of a tragedy in accordance with Aristotleʼs theory. The plot of the play has a unity of action and is completely self-contained without outside intervention, making it realistic and consistent with what Aristotle believed to be true of the perfect tragedy. Every event which occurs in the story is caused by an earlier event, starting with the incentive event, and becoming more complicated up to the climax, which leads to unraveling events all the way to the end. In Oedipus Rex the incentive action is the plague of Thebes “Ye sicken all, well wot I, yet my pain . . . I have sent Menoeceus' son, Creon, my consort's brother, to inquire of Pythian Phoebus at his Delphic shrine, how I might
Open Document