Melodrama: The Undying Philosophical Ideal

1988 Words8 Pages
Melodrama: The Undying Philosophical Ideal Amongst the popular theatrical forms of the 19th century, melodrama continues to prevail as timeless and influential. Since its inception, melodrama’s impact is noted within theater, film, and American society and history. Melodrama In order for one to understand Melodrama and its influence, a clear definition must be had. One of the earliest attempts to defining Melodrama was written in 1611 by an English Dramatist by the name of John Fletcher, “A tragi-comedy is not so-called in respect of mirth and killing, but in respect it wants deaths, which is enough to make it no tragedy, yet brings some near it, which is enough to make it no comedy, which must be a representation of familiar people, with such kind of trouble as no life be questioned; so that a god is as lawful in this as in a tragedy, and mean people in a comedy.” (Powell, 145) At the time of Fletchers definition, the form of melodrama had not yet been conceived. The composition and definition of melodrama evolved up until it became a popular form in the 19th century. Perhaps the best definition of melodrama can be taken from Wilson and Goldfarb’s Living Theatre, which states, “Historically, a distinct form of drama popular throughout the nineteenth century which emphasized action, suspense, and spectacular effects; generally melodrama used music to heighten the dramatic mood. Melodrama had stock characters and clearly defined villains and heroes, and it presented unambiguous confrontations between good and evil.” (Wilson, G-7) Along with having a clear definition, one must also understand the common characteristics of the 19th century melodrama such as; music played a key factor in order to enhance the emotions of the audience or to signify specific characters. Typical melodramas also operated within an episodic form, which always included
Open Document