Just Action In The Civil Rights Movement

1126 Words5 Pages
When the phrase a “just action” comes to mind, we usually draw our understanding of it through our judicial system, religious figures, political leaders, scientific studies, and personal beliefs. The basis of deeming certain actions or behaviors as justified have changed many times during our species existence. For example, during the middle Ages, most of the ideologies at the time were based on religious authorities of the church, and not on empirical reasoning or external evidence. Morality was a stronger influence on determining whether or not something was marked as being justified. However, religion today is not an adequate reference to determine what behaviors or ideas are considered “just action”. In today’s context, a “just action” is a universal rational thought, behavior, or idea that is non bias, knowledgeable, persuasive,…show more content…
Its impact was to demonstrate that an oppressed, relatively powerless and unrepresented group can generate social change through the widespread use of social protest in eliminating laws of racial segregation and discrimination (Morris). It also evoked the idea that human oppression is not inevitable and that collective action can generate change (Morris). There existed no ambiguity for what this movement was aiming towards, which means that minimal internal conflict existed between supporters. The final piece of evidence supporting the claim that the civil rights movement was a “just action” is because the principles of the movement affected many social, political, and academic institutions in the U.S. and across the world. Scholars of social movements have increasingly come to recognize the pivotal role that the civil rights movement has played in generating movements in America and abroad (Morris). In essence the logic of the movement had become a universal and fundamental standard for people living in
Open Document