J&L Finance Case

837 Words4 Pages
J&L Railroad Harvard Case Solution & Analysis Question 1. Should S&L hedge all of its exposure to diesel fuel for the ensuring year? What percentage of the 210 million gallons would you hedge? Answer: J&L Rail Road should go for hedging, but it is not necessary to hedge all of its exposure as for its diesel fuel. It is because of the reason that, 17.5 million gallons are being just an expected amount of fuel and in future the perfect hedge cannot be achieved. J&L should accurately estimate the future demand as the demand is decreasing due to the reason that in 2008 there was a recession that affects the fuel prices and it soften the demand.The percentage of the 210 million gallon would be hedged as J&L go for the future contracts with the suppliers at the fixed rate and the percentage they should hedge for the fuel prices should be around 25% it is because of the reason that for the first quarter of the year they should store the inventory for the future demand. This percentage is lower because of the lower demand. Question 2. What are the pros and cons of using NYMEX contracts versus using the risk management products offered by KCNB? Is the use of a monthly average price a net advantage or disadvantage to J&L? What about for the bank? Answer: NYMEX PROS The benefit of the NYMEX contract was that, it provides the mark to the market transaction facility in which J&L’s position was settled daily and this market to market restricted towards lower exposure of risks as 5% margin was required for the contract from both the parties and any increase and decrease in the position of the buyer and seller were deducted on a daily basis. CONS For J&L Rail Road cannot use the hedging on diesel fuel because of the reason that NYMEX did not deal with the fuel hedging contracts and for that reason J&L firstly has

More about J&L Finance Case

Open Document