Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity

1183 Words5 Pages
Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity Liberty University Summary This is my book review of Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity, by David N. Entwistle. This book, as noted on the cover, introduces its readers to worldview issues. “The term worldview came into the English language as a translation of the German Weltanschauung,” which might loosely be translated as “life perspective” or “confessional vision”. The definition of worldview provided by the text states “a worldview is a set of presuppositions which we hold about the basic make-up of the world” (pg. 56). A person’s worldview will affect his or her opinion on integrating or not integrating the two. And I would also explain that presuppositions, according to the text, means assumptions which may be true, partially true or entirely false (p. 56). “All truth is God’s truth” (Entwistle, 2010 p. 13) rings through this book. Entwistle (2010) describes five models for integration: Enemies, Spies, Colonists, Neutral Parties, and Allies. Enemies believe, that faith and reason cannot be in agreement. Christian combatants believe that the Bible is the one truth while secular combatants believe science is the one truth. Spies do not accept the tenets of Christianity but see activities such as prayer or forgiveness as useful to the secular world. Colonists are religious advocates who engage the scientific community in an effort to convert others to their way of life. Neutral parties see Christianity and psychology as two mutually exclusive disciplines, with little to no overlap. Allies see Christianity and psychology as two complementary methods for discovering, truth. The book explains that there is no difference between sacred and secular combatants when it comes to truth. Human nature states that we are all born with sin having good and evil within our hearts.

More about Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity

Open Document