The government is in control of how the prisons are run and ensure the safety of the individuals housed within the prison and society. The government hires a private company to design, build and manage a private prison. The company is running the prison intending to make a profit. The government pays the company a daily per diem rate for each inmate. The more inmates the private prison houses and the longer the sentence, the more money the company will receive from the government.
Ethics within the Apparel Industry Sweatshops are found worldwide, they are factories in the apparel industry that operate illegally, forcing workers to work long hours in horrible working conditions at a low salary. Often these workers are obligated to work under such condition not by choice, but rather they are obligated. These workers are often immigrants that are threatened with legal action, accused of committing crimes or ordinary people that are abducted and forced to work for free, frequently threatened with death. These workers are restricted from ethical rights. Sweatshops have always been an issue within the Apparel Industry; companies seek out cheap alternatives to having mass production of clothing for cheaper rates.
Since 1984, the first for-profit prison was contracted the industry had grown exponentially. As it states in the text, "private facilities appear to perform at the same level of efficiency as public facilities, and mimics the public model but achieves modest cost savings" (Foster, 2006). Advocates argue with the corrections that they could save the public ten to twenty percent in operation costs of jails and prisons with privatization. Privatizations provide nonprofit places such as halfway houses, drug and alcohol treatments, and charitable organizations. These are places that are contracted companies with the jails and prisons because they are either short term or facilities don't provide the services.
Private sectors have as much knowledge and skill as public sectors. The teams can conceptualize negotiations and requests that include performance goals based on efficiency and value for money calculations (National Council for Public-Private Partnerships, n.d.). The private partner would contract services and facilities with the public agency. Opening facilities operated through cost-effective private sector will alleviate current facility struggles. Services from uniforms to regular operations can be significantly less and just as successful as a public detention center.
Jails were used to hold those awaiting trial or those who had been convicted and were waiting for their corporal or capital punishment to be carried out. These jails were in horrible condition and poor men, women, and children all lived together in filth, with little food or sanitary conditions. The fee system was an early bail system that was used by the rich; it prevented them from going to jail. During the 1700s John Howard, an English reformer made many changes to the way jails were operated. As a result of his efforts, the Penitentiary Act was passed in 1779.
The increased privatization has both positive and negative impacts. For the positive impacts, privatization of state prisons has reduced the demand for more state prisons. This implies that the cost of managing and constructing the prisons has been substantially reduced. The state can therefore divert the funds that would have been used in managing the prisons to other more beneficial programs. Privately run prisons are managed by private entities in conjunction with the government.
With promises to provide additional facilities, more secure facilities, more jobs and better jobs while reducing government spending, privatization looked as though it might be a viable solution. However, after decades of research and study on the privatization of prisons there has been an emergence of issues and arguments related to privatization, both positive and negative. Proponents of Privatization Perhaps the most influential reason for state and federal governments to privatize prisons
Prison Privatization is a broadly defined term for the privatization of prisons and prison-related services. In some cases, this may include transferring control of existing public sector prisons to private companies. However, more commonly private companies are contracted to design, build, and operate new prisons and jails by federal, state, and local governments (Zito, 2003). In still other instances, private companies may be contracted to provide things such as medical care, counseling, food services, and maintenance within publicly run prisons and jails (Zito,
With these improvements comes the fact that our prisons are too small for the amount of people that are being put in jail, this includes county, state, as well as federal. We can also blame our overpopulation on the fact that crime rates fluctuate such as what we are seeing in our country now. With a bad economy comes more crime, people get desperate in times of need and will do whatever it takes to put food on the table or pay the bills to have a roof over their heads. Another negative aspect of overpopulating our prison system is the fact that the tax payer gets stuck with the larger bills to house these inmates. Overcrowding of our prisons is a bad situation that will continue to get worse unless our government figures out a solution.
Privatisation is the selling of public sector assets to the private sector in order to introduce competition and improve market efficiency. One argument for privatisation is that private companies are incentivised by profit by cutting costs and producing more efficiently. If you work for a government run industry, managers do not usually share in any profits. However, in private firms managers will usually receive a share of the profits motivating them to work harder, and as they are interested in making profit they are more likely to cut business costs and aim to be more efficient. Since privatisation, companies such as BT, and British Airways have shown degrees of improved efficiency and higher profitability due to the competitiveness within their respective industries.