Hamlet (Evalulative Argument)

967 Words4 Pages
The several unresolved conflicts found in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet have been an infinite source of constant debate for readers. Most prominent among them is Hamlet’s madness. Whether Hamlet’s madness is genuine or feigned is left open for various interpretations due to the play’s ambiguous nature. However, with Hamlet’s abilities to think and act rationally, to cease putting on an “antic disposition,” and to perform noble acts, the audience will find it easy to agree with Samuel Johnson’s notion that “… the hero’s ‘madness,’ a source of ‘much mirth’ to eighteenth-century audiences, was merely pretended …” It is notable to the audience that Hamlet has continued both thinking and acting rationally throughout the play, even behind his façade of insanity. For instance, before the performance of The Murder of Gonzago, Hamlet explains to Horatio, “There is a play tonight before the King. / One scene of it comes near the circumstance, / which I have told thee, of my father’s death. / I prithee, when thou seest that act afoot, / even with the very comment of thy soul / observe my uncle. If his occulted guilt / do not itself unkennel in one speech, / it is a damned ghost that we have seen” (Ham 5.2.80-87). In this scene, Hamlet devises a plan to determine Claudius’ guilt and outlines it to Horatio and asks for his help with absolute sanity. In addition, Hamlet resourcefully develops another plan that rids him of his troublesome, spying, former friends, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. On the way to England, Hamlet “devised a new commission … / [requesting] that, on the view and knowing of these contents, / without debatement further, more or less, / … [have] the bearers put to sudden death” (Ham 5.2.32-46). Here, Hamlet explains to Horatio how he wrote a forged document, which asked the officials of England to execute Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, as opposed to the

More about Hamlet (Evalulative Argument)

Open Document