Halo Effect In Hiring

1694 Words7 Pages
Halo Effect in Hiring Starlin Lorenzo Professor: Termaine C. Garden 4/20/2012 Halo Effect in Hiring The halo effect refers to a cognitive bias whereby the perception of a particular trait is influenced by the perception of above features in a sequence of interpretations. Halo effect has significant interaction between business justification and applicant attractiveness on selection decisions. Specifically, individuals given the business justification are more likely to hire attractive applicants over unattractive applicants are equally likely to be hired. The concept of physical attractiveness also undermined when we apply ourselves, as several studies have shown that the correlation between how you see attractive people themselves and how others see them is very low, i.e. we overestimated with respect to our physical attractiveness. A business justification for basing a hiring decision on a non job-related factor (i.e. attractiveness), unattractive applicants were more likely to be seen as qualified, be hired, and given higher starting salaries than attractive applicants. For males, attractive males were rated as more qualified, were more likely to be hired and were offered higher starting salaries. Thus, differential subjective appraisals still appear to be operating in the selection process. In addition, there were consistent effects for gender with males being rated higher than females although the resumes were all designed to be equivalent. The gender bias related to the “beauty is beastly” effect may be stronger and more pervasive than previously believed. Irrespective of the recent surge in the attention given to legality in personnel decisions, attractiveness appears to remain an integral component of selection processes. From a practical standpoint, HR managers, and all those involved in the hiring process, should be
Open Document