George Orwell: Shooting an Elephant Analysis

814 Words4 Pages
George Orwell: Shooting an Elephant. In "Shooting an Elephant", a narrative story, George Orwell describes his life as a British police officer in Burma, which is now Myanmar, during the nineteen twenties. He speaks of the way that he was treated by the natives along with the way the British treated these people. He talks about the evils of imperialism, and the way many viewed the practice. The way many imperialists spoke of it being "the white man's burden" to bring civility to the indigenous people around the world sickened Orwell. The issues that Orwell mentioned were hardly brought to light until the nineteen forties when many British colonies gained independence from the empire that had held them for decades or centuries. The story begins in Moulmein, which was a city in lower Burma, where Orwell was stationed. In the opening lines, he illustrates the general discontent that the native population felt towards him and the Europeans in general. He describes it as "petty" even though he felt the same general sentiment about the imperialist nations. He says that he was tripped by a young Burman in a game of Football, or Soccer as it is referred to in the States, and the referee turned a blind eye. The crowd jeered him with “hideous” laughter. Orwell claims that the young Buddhist priests were likely the worst about throwing insults and jeers when he was "at a safe distance". This treatment was not caused by anything that was done by the young officer, but the fact that he was British. In fact, Orwell claims that if a European woman were to visit the bazaar, she would almost definitely be spat upon Orwell mentions that he was torn between hating the empire that he served, or stabbing one of the Buddhist priests in the gut with a bayonet. He brings up this internal struggle to show that neither side is particularly kind. While humans have an innate craving to
Open Document