That isn’t very safe. Then, another problem would be when you are at intersections. Ones that are normally controlled by stop signs would be a little easier to navigate, but what about intersections that have stops light at an intersection of two fast speed roads. Everybody would be crashing in to each other, and then that we leave us with a bunch of crunched cars and fatalities. So obviously we understand that without the rules of the road it would not be safe at intersections, but what about on roads that do not have major intersections?
The greater the speed the greater the chance of someone getting injured or killed in a crash and that is why speed kills. We sometimes speed because we are late to something important. When we are speeding all we are thinking about is getting to our destination as soon as possible. We do not think of the consequences if something were to happen. When you are speeding in your car the greater the speed you are traveling the greater the impact in an accident.
(www.agentinsure.com) To counterbalance this dangerous activity, drivers need to become more conscious of their personal responsibility to be a defensive driver. Martin Gottfried, in his essay “Rambos of the Road,” states that “there has recently been an epidemic of auto macho – a competition perceived and expressed in driving.” (500) There are many types of aggressive driving, such as, speeding, racing, frequently changing lanes, cutting off other drivers, failing to signal, running red lights, failing to yield, tailgating, slowing rapidly to discourage a tailgater, etc…The list is long. Many people probably drive aggressively and are not even aware of it. Aggressive driving can be caused by multiple things such as, weather conditions, wet roads, impatience, traffic, or trying to save time. All of these things can irritate even the best of drivers, and cause them to make poor decisions on the road.
To be effective, the punishment must be harsh enough to actually deter people from committing crimes. A more effective way is the “carrot and stick” policy, in which the law abider is given an incentive to follow rules, and is punished if he does not. While few would really argue against taking the bite out of punishment, there are some arguments that deterrence is not nearly as effective as we'd like it to be. Statistics showing high crime rates among people who have already been in prisons, or punished in other ways can easily be used to demonstrate that deterrence isn't so very effective. The sheer threat of punishment is not enough to ensure the smooth functioning of a law-abiding society, as countless examples of tyranny and police states illustrate.
There are many things that distract people from driving safely and we all know of ways to prevent accidents but it is up to the person driving to make that choice, right?. Men and women who eat, work, or use devices while driving are more apt to crash or cause an accident than those who drive safe and pay close attention to the road. There has been plenty of research on this topic and things have been implemented; however, people still disobey the laws and use their phones, or change CD’s, while driving. If drivers of both sexes would reduce the use of devices and other types of distractions while driving and increase their attention on the road, then there would be a decrease in the number of accidents and crashes caused by distractions and reduced number of deaths caused by distractions. There is plenty of space for further research on this topic that must be done.
Another argue is that at the age of twenty-one (21) teenagers still should be issue a driver’s license do to the fact of immaturity. Teenage drivers are very impatient and childish. They would constantly switch driving lanes, race other drivers, and speed up to 100 mph trying to beat a red light. If your teenage drivers are immature they are more likely to act recklessly behind the wheel and cause bad car crashes on our street. I also feel that soon as teenagers sit behind the wheel, they tend to get distracted by the lease things.
Cause and Effects of Texting While Driving Texting while driving is a major issue affecting today’s society. Texting has grown to be one of the biggest forms of communication among people, despite the fact that some of these messages might be sent from behind the wheel of a moving vehicle. As a result, distracted driving often occurs removing the main objective a driver should be focusing on; the road ahead. Texting-related vehicular accidents and fatalities have caused a majority of states to establish texting bans, making this act illegal while driving. With texting-related accidents increasing, new approaches and resources are being developed to eliminate this epidemic problem.
Eventually from neglecting that issue one broken window then evolves into numerous other broken windows. This disorder is then left unattended which will clearly suggest that no one cares about the problem. From that point the degenerates of the streets become attracted to that particular area and this invites further disorder and more serious crimes to appear. Policing in neighborhoods should be based on an understanding of the connection between order maintenance and crime prevention. This implies that if disorderly behaviors in public places such as petty vandalism, begging, vagrancy, prostitution, drug dealing, loitering and murder are regulated then a significant drop in serious crime will follow.
The purpose also is if law enforcement was to take the evidence it would not be used in the court of law unless issue or that person can be set free of all charges. Basically one wrong moved can make us lose a suspect of a horrible crime if we are not careful. Law enforcement just need to be cautious so they are doing their jobs correct, and setting a person free will get them into trouble (cjlf.org, 2011). When we are identifying the exclusionary rule it is a great rule to have so police have to stop and think. Police have to think before they search because it could cost them a lot if they just do what they want.
The basic elements of this theory are that people have free will, crime is attractive due to the possible big pay off, crime can be deterred if the punishment is worse than the crime, and that the punishment must be severe and swift enough to convince criminals that crime does not pay. In the mid 1970’s the Contemporary Choice Theory came about. It was shown that rehabilitation failed to prevent crimes. Public fear arose as there was an increase in criminal activity, prison disturbances occurred, and the public media was able to depict criminals as being dangerous and unworthy of sympathy. This theory