Film Study - Avatar

777 Words4 Pages
In his film Avatar, director James Cameron compares the Na’vi and the humans to show the inadequacy of humans to only care about appearances and materialistic things. By depicting the Na’vi as part of the planet which all together functions happily as a collective, Cameron influences the audience to disapprove the like of humans who are divided through technology and money. Cameron uses visual symbolism to present the humans loss of connectedness. This is shown through the “queues” (the extended nervous system plait) that create “a network – a global network”. It is an “electrochemical communication between the roots of the trees. Like the synapses between neurons”. The Pandoran link between the people and the animals is a direct symbol of how humans rely on trees to provide us oxygen and animals for food. Unlike the humans, the Na’vi respect and fully understand their animals and wildlife. The contrast of how the Na’vi treat their world and their happiness from that compared to the humans respect for the world and their happiness reveals the belief that we should be more connected to our environment. Like the humans in Avatar, we too often forget that “the wealth of this world isn’t in the ground – it’s all around us”. As we forget that our environment, our Earth, is vital for our survival. Cameron’s use of dialogue positions the viewer’s to see the humans as judgemental. The humans believe the Na’vi are “savages” because they “don’t want [medicine, human education, English, roads]. No, they like mud.” The humans believe that because the Na’vi do not have all the technology and money then they must be inferior to them. However Cameron depicts the Na’vi as more intelligent in their understanding and ‘happier’ than the humans because of their lack of materialistic objects. In the world today, people are being judged on their appearances constantly no matter what
Open Document