Eye-Witness Abduction Case Studies

5668 Words23 Pages
ABDUCTION AND MURDER CASE STUDY ON LEADERSHIP AND PROCESS S. Irene Matz, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, California State University, Fullerton Introduction may 16, 2005. His blank stare devoid of emotion, ashen-faced Alejandro Avila avoided eye contact as eight men and four women slowly filed into the jury box. Nearly three years after six-year-old Samantha Runnion was abducted, sexually brutalized and murdered, the death penalty phrase of Avila’s trial represented the culminating, yet anti-climatic moment. The moment would end thousands of investigative hours by the Orange County Sheriff’s Department, intense hours, even silent grieving hours. Yet the energy justified the result: Arrest and conviction in the horrific, unspeakable…show more content…
Christine Murray, assigned to the case because of her expertise in investigation and prior experience with the Amber Alert, “An eye-witness abduction, as with this case, provides a greater sense of urgency. A reported abduction without a witness is treated as a missing child. This means the child isn’t where he or she is expected to be and therefore creates less urgency.” The initial response stimulated county-wide law enforcement broadcasts, media alerts within 15 minutes of the abduction, and, within 75 minutes, images of Samantha filled hundreds of thousands of television screens in southern California. The statewide Amber Alert was sounded by 7:05 p.m. At 7:15 p.m., an immediate investigative response and dragnet, under the direction of Stanton Police Services of the Orange County Sheriff’s Department, ran checks on sex offenders and began verifying tips from community callers. Little Sarah, the only eye-witness to the crime, identified the abductor’s car as green with the letter “H” on the vehicle (which was later found in the center of the suspect’s car’s license plate). Sarah’s description was relayed to the media and public. The urgency and immediacy of information flow were crucial to investigators. Statistics show 74 percent of abducted children are slain within three hours of disappearance, according to a 2002 study commissioned by the Attorney General of the state of Washington and the U.S. Justice Department, Office of…show more content…
Michael Tynes, investigator on the case, said, “It was the collaboration between organizations that was responsible for one common goal. The FBI provided a resource to us. They were there to assist us. Through the sheriff’s leadership, the end result was a collaborative effort.” Collaboration leads to greater success than competition. In the Runnion case, this was further exemplified by two independent county sheriff’s departments – Orange and Riverside – working in partnership rather than competing. Since Samantha’s body was found in Riverside County, officials there could have assumed legal jurisdiction, but rather, without hesitation, fully cooperated with Orange County by protecting the crime scene and relinquishing the body to investigators. This aided in a seamless investigation and caused no impasse because of territorial claims. The investigation proceeded smoothly, avoiding turf issues. After Avila’s arrest, Sheriff Carona publicly credited all law enforcement leaders who cooperated and collaborated with his
Open Document