It is difficult to hold prosecutors accountable for acts of misconduct. Since prosecutors are often viewed as the “good guys” by the public, many times unethical, as well as illegal acts will be tolerated by the courts and criminal justice system as a whole. Prosecutorial misconduct is considered any action taken by the prosecutor in a criminal case that is against the law and/or unethical. Prosecutorial evidence can be anything from harassing witnesses on the stand, pressing unfounded charges against defendants, tampering with evidence, withholding evidence, up to taking bribes. Prosecutors can sometimes get away with misconduct as it is extremely difficult to prove that misconduct had actually taken place.
Prosecutors are responsible to make sure the guilty person is prosecuted and that innocent people are protected from unwarranted prosecution. Prosecutors decide which types of plea bargains to enter and can ask the court to dismiss the charges. Prosecutors have more discretion than any other legal person including judges. A prosecutor’s position is much more difficult than portrayed on television. On television, the prosecutor, or ADA comes in tries the case and leaves.
the manner in which the court system is structure and run affects the extent to which members of the public obtain access to the justice system. When a court is structured so that criminal cases, no matter how minor or serious, must be handle by a lower-level court with an otherwise excessively large caseload and few resources or services. For example, the negative effecton the quality of justice may be good that citizens do not even bother to report crimes. Proper structuring of the jurisdiction of courts which is the legal authority to hear cases, and providing adequate resources to handle the resulting caseload fairly, promptly, and effectively is only part of a well-run court system. Much can be done to make courts more user-friendly to the public and to improve public access to justice.
The fines for noncompliance are so low that they don’t really punish the companies. Many of the laws are rarely enforced. One study found that a business could expect to be inspected for child labor violations once every fifty years or so7 . When a company is inspected and violations are found the maximum penalty of $10,000 is rarely enforced. Many state laws differ from state to state.
A constitutional amendment takes an issue away from the normal process of democracy. However most proposals aren’t inspired by a broad national consensus but instead for political gains, e.g. the day after the Supreme Court ruled flag burning to be protected speech in 1989, the US representative Michael Bilirakis introduced an amendment outlawing desecration of the flag. Amendments to ban flag burning have been introduced in every session of Congress since, spanning more than two decades. Another reason why most proposed amendments fail to pass is the difficulties posed by the very complex amendment process.
The government could not control all these invasions, so this was another component that helped the fall of the Roman Empire. Document 5 shows bias because it blames the fall of the civilization on internal decay. This is significant because if a very well organized government that had been able to keep order throughout such a large empire could no longer do it, then this meant nobody else could. All of these political
M1 : Compare and contrast the role and function of judges, lawyers and lay people within the English courts. Magistrates are people who volunteer in a magistrate’s court; they have no formal legal qualifications and are part of a ‘bench’ which normally consists of 3 magistrates who listen to cases. The ‘bench’ can act as a jury if the defendant pleads not guilty and can also pass sentences. If the defendant was to plead not guilty the magistrates would simply pass a sentence. There is only one person in the magistrate’s court who is a qualified lawyer and that is the clerk of the court who advises the Magistrates on points of law.
You are limited to the amount of cases you can file in small claims court that are over $2,500.00 to two per year. Because of this, the claim against Cathy will count as one of those cases, but the claim against Al will not count as one of the cases you are limited to file in Small Claims Court due to the smaller amount. It is important that you have not exceeded the amount of lawsuits over $2,500.00 for this year already if you have filed other cases in the Small Claims Court. You are still within the required statute of limitations to file your claims against both Al and Cathy. With regard to both the cases here, you will be required to represent yourself.
Indeed revenue from illegal immigrants is estimated at eleven billion a year to social security alone, and there’s not even a pretense of those payments leading to eventual benefits (Krayewski 2014)”. Although majority of immigrants pay taxes and support or economy they are not considered “United States citizens.” He also came to the conclusion that “immigrants would pay taxed if they didn’t have to worry about possible deportation as a consequence,” (Krayewski 2014). That is understandable, they should not have to live in fear of being deported for helping out a country that they are living in because they are not considered legal. In his third reason he points out that most illegal immigrants are law-abiding in the first place and how it would decrease the crime of crossing over, without authorization it is considered a misdemeanor. His reasoning for this is that “The vast majority want to stay in the country in order to work and so naturally steer clear of breaking any laws.” Which in most cases is true, immigrants are looking for a better life, a fresh start.
felonies. Misdemeanors and the kind of things even mostly law abiding citizens run into (parking tickets, speeding tickets, paying taxes late, jaywalking etc) wouldn't count. The reason here is that you want EVERYONE in the country to respect the law - and you don't want a large population in fear of even minor violations. But alas such a reform is far far too radical in today's political climate. (I do support the Startup Visa types of efforts - but I worry that they exclude far too many people - and that innovation comes from the most unexpected places - not just from folks with technology degrees or who have been vetted by venture capitalists) Collapse this post Why Not Let Immigrants Employ Americans?