Evaluate the Evidence for Plate Movement (40 Marks)

1048 Words5 Pages
Plate tectonics (also known as the conveyor belt principle) is a scientific theory that describes the large-scale motions of the Earth’s lithosphere, building on concepts from the theory of continental drift (movement of the Earth’s continents relative to each other). The lithosphere is broken up into 7 main tectonic plates which move from 0-100mm annually. It is thought that the continents once formed a single land mass called Pangea that drifted apart, this is the start of the main idea of plate tectonics. In 1596, Abraham Ortelius first made the speculation that continents might have ‘drifted’ but the concept was developed further by Alfred Wegener in 1912. Presently, Earth Scientists agree on the observation and assumption that the plates have moved with respect to one another, but they still debate as to how and when. The main question that still remains to confuse scientists is; ‘what is the motor behind the movement’ and this is where science diverges into different theories. One theory that supports Pangea is the similarity of coastlines on different continents that suggest that they may once have been joined, for them once to have been connected must mean that they continental drift happened. It was Taylor who argued that the eastern South American matched the west coast of Africa like a jigsaw puzzle. Even though the coastlines didn’t match perfectly (maybe due to erosion/weathering), he later found that the continental shelves matched more closely which matched the theory that those continents were once together. The strongest evidence for continental movement is the study of paleomagnetism. The study of the intensity and orientation of the Earths magnetic field is preserved in the magnetic orientation of certain minerals found in rocks formed throughout geologic time. A study of the ocean floors have demonstrated that the orientation of the earths
Open Document