Emily Dickenson vs Plato

491 Words2 Pages
Emily Dickenson’s poems“Tell all the truth” , “The brain“ and Plato’s “allegory of the cave” are speaking of truth,and the wonders the mind can hold. In plato’s “The allegory of the cave”, the prisoners eyes are hurt by the light he was shown; in Emily Dickenson’s” Tell all the truth”, she says “ the truth must dazzle gradually”. Each could help one another out in their points because they are portraying the same message.“The truth's superb surprise” is shown very clearly in both the poem and the allegory, for in the poem, it has been directly stated ,and in the allegory, we find that the truth is not what the prisoner had thought it was , that he will “ ..be perplexed”.“ Success in circuit lies” is telling the reader the only way to get anywhere is to move; in the allegory, the prisoners do not move and do not know of anything other than where they sit, until the one prisoner is freed. At that point, the only one who got anything done was the liberated prisoner.This all shows how truth can have many different ways of showing itself, and both plato’s writing and Emily’s writing can work together to prove one point about truth. In Emily Dickinson's” The brain” we can see her point of how much the brain is truly capable of; also, in “the allegory of the cave”, it speaks of these chains holding the prisoners’ heads in place;one can infer from the reading that this is metaphorical and really, it is just the prisoners’ own thoughts and feelings holding them back. The fact that they are being ‘held back’ can show that the mind is a powerful thing, just like in “the brain” it is “ a sponge” as it soaks up knowledge and the power to do things. One can also see the representation of the brains power when emily states it as similar to God. Also, “The brain” is comparing the mind to the outside world just as “ The allegory of the cave” uses the mind and the

More about Emily Dickenson vs Plato

Open Document