Eastern Ethical Perspectives on the Bhopal Disaster

604 Words3 Pages
Eastern Ethical Perspectives of the Bhopal Disaster Hindu ethics state to be moral you must fulfill your duties/obligations. There are two duties that must be followed: varnasrama the individual’s duty to himself and his caste, and sadharana his universal duties and the societal duties not attributed to his caste. Now if the Plant operators are in a caste, like that of the merchants, which states their duties as maximizing profit for the furtherment of the society’s economical lively-hood, it would be in their duty to do so. It would be in the lower castes duty to work within the constraints of the Operators, for in doing so their physical health would come second to that of their spiritual health by fulfilling that duty, which would eventually lead to the escape from that caste. Right action from a Buddhist point of view is quite contrary to that of Hinduism. When determining what is good the Buddhism consult their “roots.” The three good roots are non-attachment, benevolence, and understanding, and to further the examples that have the % precepts. Number one of the Five is to refrain from harming living creatures. So when the plant operators set their plan for the development of the company to create a moral organization profits would have to be second to the welfare of the workers. If profits are more important the argument might be made of the attachment of the plant to the idea of maximizing profit. Union Carbide’s ethical duty to those injured seems all around clear. Both Buddhism and Confucianism state the importance of welfare to humans, but they approach is different. Confucianism promotes the importance of self-cultivation, sometimes through the means of altruistic or righteous acts, and this disaster creates an opportunity to act in such a way, thus fortifying your moral obligation to cultivate yourself. According to Ren a ruler must act in
Open Document