Chicken In The Hen House Using a Humor

915 Words4 Pages
The Chicken in the Henhouse Humor is a rubber sword, which allows the writer to make a point without drawing blood. And this is what David Sedaris uses to strength his point about the difference between homosexuality and pedophilia in “Chicken in the Henhouse,” Sedaris’s writing style can be illustrated by the ideas in “Humor in Arguments,” edited by Andrea A Lunsford, John J Ruszkiewicz ,and Keith Walters. Readers can see how hilarious the author is. Actually, Sedaris uses his humor in 'Chicken in the Henhouse' to strengthen his argument, as it allows him to make himself likeable, to break down barriers of prejudice, and to open the readers’ eyes rather than to make them laugh. The First way that humor strengthens Sedaris’s argument is by making himself likable to the readers. In ‘humor in an Argument “Lunsford, Ruszkiewicz, and Walters note ,”In fact, a little self-deprecation can endear writers or speaker to the toughest audiences.” (396). In this quote the editors illustrate how it is essential to get attention of most readers to keep them interested. In “The Chicken in The Henhouse” Sedaris jokes about his fears of being around people, as a result of people’s confusion about homosexuals with pedophiles. Accord “I have never poked or prodded either a baby or a child, so why did I feel so dirty?” (Sedaris 222) This quote supports the argument that homosexuals can not touch any child, because their acts, perhaps, would be compulsive rather than sexual, and they think that others are misunderstanding them. Here, Sedaris uses the question if he is dirty or not to make himself likeable and affable to the readers. Also, he explains to the readers how these worried thoughts about others’ view would be a side effect to homosexuals and limit their actions. The readers laugh at the beginning, and they love the author’s character, but notice that Sedaris is
Open Document