Book banning has a huge negative effect on how students live, at school as well as at home. Book censors can only give unreasonable and unjustifiable motives for banning novels to validate their cause. In the end, the actions of the people who ban books create numerous negative effects on minors. Book banning limits student access to great works of literature. Many people regard William Shakespeare as one of the greatest English writers of all time, yet almost all of his plays have been prohibited from most schools.
This fear leads to the inevitable trepidation of books themselves. When Guy Montag presents his collection of books to his wife she, "backed away as if suddenly confronted by a pack of mice..." (66). Today, people fear the criticism of society. Children who constantly read are referred to as nerds, outcasts, loners, and even weird. With such hostility aimed at those who do read, others simply do not wish to be the victim of such negativity.
The article mainly uses provocation as a mean to lure people into reading it, but it is a dangerous method to use, as it easily could wind up offending the reader or give the reader a negative attitude toward the article after only reading a few lines. The title in itself is provocative, as it is a statement that, perhaps, many western parents would disagree with. Western parents might believe themselves to be the more overbearing parents, that when opposed to such an article as Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior they would feel obliged to participate in the debate. Even if it is just to point fingers and disapprove of the theories in the article. While reading the article one of the more noticeable things is the list on the front page.
It has made people uncomfortable to think that what is being described in this chilling novel reminds them of what they see outside their own windows, with the fact that humans are constantly on watch and there is practically no way to keep anything hidden. No matter what a person does, there is always a way to track it down. With all of this said, it is easy to see why it was banned from several school. The issue however, is the fact that this is a book that students should read. If too much is censored, children and teens have no way to open their minds.
The book should not be read to high school students, one reason being that it has too many racial slurs. People today get offended easily; especially the American people, they will try to sew anybody for anything, and this book will definitely trigger those emotions. The storyline takes place in the 19th century, so there were no limitations on racism like we have now. There was discrimination of the black community like slavery, lynching, unfair imprisonment, and many other ways. There are many appearances of the ‘N’ word and when we were reading in groups, it felt really uncomfortable when the word came up and I didn’t want to offend my classmates.
To begin with, teen freedom is essential in forming law abiding responsible habits for the rest of their life. This is an important negative effect of the driving curfew. Most teens disobey the law as it is. Sixteen and seventeen year olds ignore curfew laws because they find them baseless (Asfar.org). These teens, if caught, are fined for a baseless law they cannot afford.
But the question is whether parents should shave the right to check their teens social media accounts. Teenagers want their privacy, especially from their parents. They want to have conversations and inside jokes that belong only to them and their friends. Teenagers do not want to feel like they are sharing everything in their lives with their parents. This is why I believe parents should not be able to check their teen’s social media accounts.
Banned and Challenged Books: James and the Giant Peach Books are banned and challenged for a various amount of reasons. There could be abuse I n the book, jokes about physical characteristics, racism, mysticism, profanity, drugs and it might promote disobedience. But the main three reasons for banning or challenging books are, it might be sexually explicit, it may contain offensive language, or it could be unsuited to a specific age group. Parents are usually the ones who ban or challenge books. Usually to keep children from certain ideas and/or information.
Throughout the course of the novel he has violent sexual behavior that eventually leads to his self-destruction. Though Daniel Keyes establishes a gripping storyline in Flowers for Algernon, the book's overall explicit content give it no literary merit or educational value to be taught in high school curriculum. Therefore, it should be strictly limited to libraries or book stores, being banned from public school facilities all together. Daniel Keyes expresses his story, Flowers for Algernon, in a way in
teenagers sometimes give up the people they love in order to be accepted. If necessary, they sacrifice the old friend who no longer dresses well enough, listens to the right kind of music, or refuses to drink or take drugs. Potential boyfriends and girlfriends may be rejected, too, if the crowd doesn't like their looks or values. Sadly, teenagers can even cut their families out of their lives. They may be ashamed of the parents who are too poor, too conventional, too different from friends' parents.