Asses the Claim That the Increase in Martial Breakdown Is Due to Changes in Divorce Law Legislation

523 Words3 Pages
F. using material from item B and elsewhere, asses the claim that the increase in marital breakdown is due to changes in divorce law legislation. Marital breakdown is when a marriage has no more love in it, so this can result to divorce, separation, empty shell marriage or annulment. Divorce legislations are laws that have been established for the conditions and grounds of divorce. The Matrimonial Cause’s Act of 1923 approved a wife the right to divorce her husband for adultery. The Matrimonial Cause Acts of 1923 removed the double standard with respect to the ground for divorce act of 1857. While the 1923 act was simultaneous with other reforms extending the legal right of women. The 1923 Matrimonial Cause Act was placed for the demand of equal access to divorce for and women. This act led to the increase of martial breakdown because women acknowledge that they don’t really have to do the traditional roles in a family and also it no easy for to divorce their husbands; in modern society now the increase of martial breakdown is also due to women’s understanding of the law. The 1984 matrimonial and family proceeding act allowed divorce after one year of marriage, as it was 3 years before you could get divorced when this new law was established the amount of divorces increased this could also be a result to the double of divorce in a year. The act of 1984 also resulted to the increase of martial breakdown as the couple no longer had to wait for, three years of marriage to expire for them to get divorced. So therefore martial breakdown (divorce) had doubled in a year resulting statics on divorce. However, functionalist Ronald Fletcher (1996) said the reason why divorce rate has increased because of the rising expectations of marriage. In item B it explains that couples are not willing to live in `unhappy, empty shell marriages`. This is also linked to the
Open Document