Asl Memo

927 Words4 Pages
MEMO DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 28, 2008 Margie Voren, Dean of Student Special Services, Central State University Megan Wells, Danny Tommack, and Brandon Tuck Progress report on whether Central State University should recognize American Sign Language as a foreign language ________________________________________________________________________ In this progress report, we review our research into the possibility of recognizing ASL as a foreign language and incorporating courses in ASL into the foreign-language curriculum at CSU. We also include the results of our initial research into legislation passed in Texas that recognizes ASL as a foreign language. Introduction On April 24, we received approval to research whether CSU should…show more content…
We did meet with Suzanne Christopher and discussed with her the characteristics of ASL that make it “non-English.” Ms. Christopher provided us with current research concerning ASL’s linguistic identity. After analyzing this research, we concluded that ASL has its own distinct grammar, morphology, modality, structure, syntax, markers, and idioms. It therefore meets the criterion by which CSU defines a language as foreign. (Not all sign languages meet the criterion, though ASL clearly does. For example, Signed Exact English cannot be considered a “non-English” language; it assigns a unique sign to each English word and uses standard English grammar and syntax.) Scholarly research also supports the idea that ASL is a foreign language. Drawing upon interpreter/linguist Rhonda Jacobs’ article “ASL as a Truly Foreign Language,” we created a chart that classifies languages into one of four categories according to degree to which they differ from English (see appendix.) According to the Department of State’s Foreign Service Institute, ASL is classified with Arabic, Japanese, Chinese, and Korean in the highest level, Group Four; the higher the level, the more difficult is the language to learn, owing largely to its being substantially different from…show more content…
Comments on obtaining recognition through state legislation: We contacted the following people about the Texas legislation that grants statewide recognition to ASL:   Dr. Marietta L. Yeates, Professor, Stephen F. Austin State University Dr. Sherman Wilcox, Associate Professor of Linguistics, University of New Mexico Marietta L. Yeates, Professor in the Deaf/Hard of Hearing Program at Stephen F. Austin State University, explained that Stephen F. Austin’s recognition of ASL preceded the statewide legislation. The university passed measures internally to grant recognition and then revised its curriculum to reflect the fact that ASL was officially a foreign language. Sherman Wilcox, co-author of Learning to See: Teaching American Sign Language as a Second Language and Associate Professor of Linguistics at the University of New Mexico, cautioned us about attempting to recognize ASL through state legislation. He reminded us that “universities cherish their independence” and that politicians attempting to mandate changes in the curriculum often meet resistance from universities. He suggested that seeking recognition internally (by revising university policy) would be a logical first step and perhaps a more effective way of obtaining recognition. We found his arguments
Open Document