Anthropological Criteria for "Social Race" vs "Biological Race"

366 Words2 Pages
“Biological race” is a term that is used when a common biological basis is assumed. This is typically involves phenotype, particularly skin color, hair texture and other physical features. This notion is so pervasive in our society that “race” is commonly found on forms and includes such categories as “Caucasian, Asian, Native, African-American,” etc. And yet, race has cannot be defined biologically. “Social race” or “ethnicity” refers to a shared cultural background, including such things as language, religion, holidays, or style of dress. Ethnicity occurs independently of race; for example, persons of European or African origin may be considered Hispanic if they were born into that culture (Kottak, 2010, pp. 236-7). Certain diseases are common in some biological races. Sickle cell anemia has long been associated with African races, but is also found in populations from the Mediterranean regions, including Greeks, Turks and Sicilians. In this case, the gene mutation provides a resistance to malaria and therefore spread along trade routes where malaria was common (Adelman, 2003). Sub-Saharan Africans are dark skinned, as are Australian Aborigines and South Pacific Melanesians (Adelman, 2003). Hereditary diseases and skin tone are considered to be biological racial characteristics. Hays (2009) states, “Japan is regarded as one of the world’s most insular countries” and adamantly defends “ethnic purity” against foreigners. Japanese journalist Kumiko Makihara was repeatedly questioned by police, who suspected she was an illegal immigrant due to her above-average height and tanned skin tone. I find it interesting that while some Americans may lump Asians into one ethnic group, the Japanese are openly hostile towards Koreans, Chinese and Vietnamese, even if they are born in Japan and adopt Japanese customs (Hays, 2009). In Japan, even a common

More about Anthropological Criteria for "Social Race" vs "Biological Race"

Open Document