They proved that progression in this field of study can have vast as well as monumental improvements in contemporary science and technology. Eugenics and Frankenstein both included advanced ways of thinking and study. However, with advancement, setbacks can also follow. In both cases, the development of the ideas of Eugenics and creation of Frankenstein’s monster were thought to be ideas that would revolutionize scientific thinking and bring the ability to even further the scientific field of study. This statement was proven to be precise.
Society doesn’t lend itself to be studied in a laboratory and this is because it is so complex and cannot be artificially created. It is also difficult to control and identify all factors that could effect behaviour and this is because society id an ‘open system’, not a ‘closed system’. In addition it is hard to match people into control and experimental groups because there will be individual differences
Examine why some sociologists choose not to use experiments when conducting research? (20 marks) Many sociologists choose not to use laboratory experiments for research because it fails to achieve their main goal of validity. To have complete control of conditions in a lab experiment is impossible as that level of control over variables would require a completely artificial environment which will be very expensive. However in contrast other sociologists such as Positivists disagree and are in favour of laboratory experiments. Other alternatives to laboratory experiments are field experiment and the comparative method.
You’d be scared that there is an attack coming your way. 2. How did the naval arms race encourage the development of the alliance system the way it did? Be sure to refer to Great Britain, France, Germany, and Russia, as well as each of the alliance groups specifically. The navel arms raced encouraged the Development of the Alliance system, Because the joining of The different countries meant even more power to both Germany and Great Britain.
In this essay, I will summarize Jared Diamond's accounts of world history and evolution of culture. Jared Diamond begins Guns with a prologue which sets the stage for the rest of the book. Approached in New Guinea by his friend and local politician Yali, he is posed a question: "Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?" Yali's question flared a nerve in Diamond. This question brought about the thesis of his book, that environment is more persuasive on development of civilization than people may have once thought.
3). I like how the author wrote about this but he did not only speak about about destroying the other societies but also using their heads and adapting what little knowledge that society has into their own and creating a more powerful and intelligent empire. I believe this was the key to the true power of the small empires that were growing back then and is revealed in the novel. The ones that truly were going to rise up and succeed were not only brutes and vicious men, but also ones that would use their heads and use intelligence and adapt it not only on the battle field but also their own lives. “Firearms reached Japan in A.D. 1543, when two Portuguese adventurers armed with harquebuses (primitive guns) arrived on a Chinese cargo ship.
The first problem Hawking addresses is whether a set of equations can predict the details of everyday life. He claims it can, due to the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics, which says that one can’t measure both position and velocity of a particle. This would allow for an infinite amount of possible universes, each with its own history. This is where it is necessary to use facts and explanations. Very few people have even heard of “quantum mechanics”, let alone what the “uncertainty principle” is and what its significance is; therefore he has to explain it to the readers.
What he calls necessities, are not really a necessity for the right reasons. Krauthammer depicts a sentimental environmentalist as someone who indulges in worshiping earth to the point of idolatry. This may be the only argument that I agree with. Some environmentalists have taken a different and extreme approach on how they view and treat our earth. While I don’t agree with worshiping earth, I disagree that Krauthammar completely disregards earth due to the fact that there are natural disasters; his statements are simply not realistic.
Of course they did. When they extended their reach and explored the surfaces of the world, the Europeans looked down upon the cultures and peoples that they imagined were incapable of the same progress that Europe had achieved. These ideas of assuming a person was inable of using no more than sticks and stones for tools was scientific fact, until Boas spoke, saying this was not the case. Boas describes why cultures and ways of being are not specified by race, by classifying the difference between the organic abilities we naturally have, and the cultural ways of using these abilities. The faculty to be able to walk, to speak, to eat and breathe comes to us instinctively as an ability we are born with.
Also their small scale means that results may not be representative or generalisable to the wider population. On the other hand interpretivists reject the laboratory experiments because it fails to achieve their main goal of validity. It is an artificial environment producing unnatural behavior. Drifting away from the advantages, There are various practical problems with laboratory experiments. Society is very complex and in practice it would be impossible to control variables that may influence a situation.