American Revolution DBQ

794 Words4 Pages
With differentiating views comes divergence and with divergence comes conflict. This is the same scenario that applies to the situation between the colonists and Great Britain. One pursued independence while the other wanted to continue its imperialistic rule until there is nothing to assimilate. With that being said, the American Revolution was an event that would inevitably happen, after all a compromise between the two sides was futile. The events leading up to the American Revolution played a vital aspect in the actual occurrence of the war, since it was Great Britain’s tyrannical actions and the colonists liberating operations that would provoke such an event. The colonists’ main goal was to detach themselves from England and become…show more content…
He means that regardless of where you came from, each person retains their natural rights of free men and women. He later states that when people unite, “...they have the right to form a civil establishment.” He probably feels this way because he as a colonist is bias towards the patriots, the ones fighting for independence and a unified political society. Speaking of natural rights, Thomas Jefferson also believed that natural rights, disregarding of place and time, is permitted to every man and woman (Document C). He states that “inhabitants of the British domination...possessed a right, which nature has given to all men...and of there establishing new societies, under such laws...shall seem mostly likely promote happiness.” He means that each and every man has the right to establish a society under their provisions. He feels this way because he too as a colonist, is bias towards the patriots and favors the idea of independence more than the belief of imperialism. In addition to liberating operations, the Second Continental Congress was issued to discuss the fundamentals of their independent government (Document D). There, politicians discussed affairs regarding Great Britain and their…show more content…
They believed that since the people initially originated from Great Britain and the proposal of colonization was theirs from the beginning, they assumed that the colonies was theirs control. In the debate on the repeal of the Stamp Act, Lord Mansfield disclosed this assumption and supported the idea that parliament had full control of the colonies (Document B). He states that the people and the colonies “...owe allegiance and subjection to their mother country.” Mansfield feels this way because he being in a high social status knows the feeling of have power and authority, therefore sides with Britain and Parliament. Speaking of Parliament, on October 1775, King George III gave a speech addressing the matters regarding Britain and the colonies (Document F). He claims that he does not want bloodshed but the “traitorous” views of the American people have provoked him to declare this war. He most likely feels this way because he as king is bias towards Great Britain and would evoke any transactions that would better his country. An additional document that would help prove my thesis would be a journal entry of a loyalist during the Boston Massacre. The POV of loyalist is essential to understand the advantages and disadvantages of both corresponding sides. Also the document would help explain why a colonist would side with Britain after all the things the Mother County has done. It would shed light
Open Document