His strategies involved more resistance than Washington’s approach did. Through his narrative, Douglass tries to persuade his audience that slavery was unacceptable so resistance was necessary. He characterizes the slave as victims and dehumanized to prove his negative perception of slavery was accurate. Washington believed the best way for the Blacks to make their mark in the world was to continue to labor even after slavery’s abolishment. He believed the best way to secure freedom and recognition was to labor and conform.
Douglass and Equiano were both Africans and slaves; however, they lived very different lives. They were both young children in their autobiographies reminiscing the horrors and hardships they had to undergo as young African slaves. Olaudah Equiano had a worse time, in my opinion, then Frederick Douglass. Equiano was able to know how it felt to be free. Moreover, he was a prince of his tribe because his father was the tribal elder of Benin.
At first it seemed he might live to see another day. Sadly, he died the next day from his wounds. Another thing that happened to slaves, in Uncle Tom’s Cabin was they were treated as property, instead of human beings. For example there was an auction held in which the merchandise were slaves! In the auction scene slave families were ripped apart from each other.
On the other hand, Malcolm X came from and underprivileged home an atmosphere of fear and anger where the seeds of bitterness were planted. The early backgrounds of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King were largely responsible for the distinct different responses to American racism. Both men ultimately became towering icons of contemporary African-American culture and had a great influence on black Americans. However, King had a more positive attitude than Malcolm X, believing that through peaceful demonstrations and arguments, blacks will be able to someday achieve full equality with whites. Malcolm X’s despair about life was reflected in his angry, pessimistic belief that equality is impossible because whites have no moral conscience King basically adopted on an integrated philosophy, whereby he felt that blacks and whites should be united and live together in peace.
If they started to rebel against the discrimination, it would only make the whites more determined to keep them oppressed. He believed that the blacks could work to gain the respect of the whites. Washington also preached that educating the blacks would not only be beneficial to them, but the whites also. They could greatly help the Southern economy and work in the factories. Many people during this time period supported his strategies and saw what he was saying as very influential.
Comparative of Narrative of the life of Frederic Douglass and The Awakening In this life we sometimes have to follow guidelines or a set of expectations of what society expects of us; but all that we really long for is to have freedom of our self. Transcendentalist, the individual, the true-self was sacred, and conforming to the norms of the institutions of society was worse than death itself. In the Narrative of the Life of Frederic Douglass, Frederic himself revolts against the peculiar institution of slavery because he made a decision in his mind that there was something more than just be a slave in life. The awakening (1899) by Kate Chopin, it should a lady that revolts against patriarchy. Douglass upholds Civil Rights, while Chopin upholds Women’s Rights; yet both essentially uphold the Right of the individual.
We can also tell this by Ellen Craft. Ellen was born in the South of America from a slave mother and a master who was her father. She was treated really badly by her mistress-the master's wife. She was given as a wedding present to her half-sister at the age of 11 who treated her badly as well. This means that the master had an impact on the slave experience because it could determine whether or not you had a good experience.
Portraying certain characters in these ways helps rally anti-slavery supporters for the abolitionist cause. One of Stowe’s main reasons for writing the novel was to show pro-slavery supporters that the abolitionist movement was valid by writing about slaves that had to undergo many hardships such as outrunning bounty hunters in order to stay united with family, or choosing between becoming a superior on a plantation and treating fellow slaves abusively rather than sticking to beliefs and staying true to his people. Stowe dramatized these hardships by adding suspenseful situations and tough decisions that reflect the characters’ wisdom and motivation to become free while keeping their morals intact. Another
U.S. History to 1870 Argumentative Essay Solomon Northup Solomon Northup’s narrative, Twelve Years as a Slave, provides great insight into the daily life of a slave to appropriately show that slavery was inhuman. The slave narrative was written to describe the life of Northup which included all the trials and tribulations that he endured in order for him to regain freedom. Even though in the early 19th century the life of a slave was insignificant and in turn not well documented. Twelve Years as a Slave opened the eyes of many white men, who were not aware of the pain and anguish African-Americans had to undergo as slaves. Therefore Northup’s book played a great deal in the abolition movement of slavery, because it simply provided an account of the true and complete tragedy of slavery.
Treachery and Virtue in “Oroonoko or The Royal Slave” Treachery and Virtue are two things that often times do not go together. They in fact contradict one another completely. However, in Oroonoko these two themes play a very important role in the development of the story as a whole. They are the basis for this paper and they teach the reader that if a man’s word is not his bond and he allows himself to be consumed with only self gratification, then that man will abandon his virtues and often become a treacherous person. Because this novel was written during a period in history that dealt with the injustices of slavery, this paper will take on the aspect of a sociological criticism.