apush zinn questions + Zinn Questions CHAPTER 1, pp. 1-11 1. According to Zinn, what is his main purpose for writing A People’s History of the United States? According to Zinn his main purpose for writing A People’s History of the United States is to detail the whole story of American's history. Not just explain the good things that happened and briefly explaining the bad.
They don’t tell the story from the victim’s point of view. 1. According to Zinn, what is his main purpose for writing A People’s History of the United States? Answer: According to ZInn, he wanted to write a history book that told the truth. He claims that history books today leave out details and the truth behind what really happened.
They believed that Montezuma had offered his valuables freely. This interpretation of the events illustrates the Spaniards’ attempt to appear virtuous and showcases their need to embellish their success in retrieving gold. Meanwhile, the Aztecs believed Montezuma was forced into this offering: “The Spaniards questioned him closely and then demanded gold.” The Aztec explanation of the events suggests a distrust in the Spanish and demonstrates their belief that the Spaniards’ arrival destroyed their society. The discrepancy between the two accounts is due to the biased viewpoints of the writers. The truth, however, can be found in-between the two stories.
This was a costly mistake. The greedy Spaniards wanted the gold and treasure the Aztecs collected. Reid wrote, “Gold, silver, and jewels were what they had sailed all the way from Spain to find” ( 25). Schaffer 2 Another factor contributing to the Aztec’s fall was Spain’s superior weapons. Stein points out, “The Aztecs were known for their skills as warriors.
As the war progressed, the articles agree that the colonists used their sea power and trading power among other towns to wear down the Indians and win the war. The national debt occurred as a result of King Philip’s War.3 They both agree that the war cost the New England colonists a significant amount of money.1 While comparable, the three articles did display unique comments about the war and different levels of credibility. The Wikipedia article discussed the relationship between the Indians being peaceful.1 While true, the Wars and Battles article better elaborated by showing the colonists preaching the gospel, trading, and fighting with the Indians.3 This gives the reader a much better idea of what the relations between the colonists and Indians were like before the war than the Wikipedia article. In the Wikipedia article the importance of Sassamon in the outbreak of the war was mentioned. Sassamon was displayed as “a figure in the outbreak of the war.
A dispute of what happened in the “New World” has been at the center of Latin American historical discourse, attempting to answer one deceptively-simple question: was it a crusade or was it genocide? Undoubtedly, the setting acted as a cooking pot for dangerous ingredients to be mixed and muddled. The Spanish were ripe from the Crusades and their Inquisition, with an unwithering aim to spread Christianity and annihilate its opposition (not to mention a tad-bit of greed and an appetite for gold). The Mexica, a cosmologically-driven civilization who saw the doom of their world near, were rather accepting of their ideals and of the Spanish newcomers. The mixture unfortunately only yielded tragedy.
Spain used ruthless brutal tactics to bring down the revolt where the U.S intervened due to sympathy for Cuban rebels. During the Spanish American war stories of Cuban righteousness and Spanish brutality were front page. The yellow journalism covered the war extensively and often inaccurately favoring the Cuban rebels but conditions in Cuba were bad enough. After defeating Spain U.S acquired new territories one of them being the Philippines making the United States the “new Spain” .The U.S faced a decision whether they wanted to annex the Philippines or not ultimately approving annexation. In
He returned to Spain in glory, having discovered the New World. What's wrong with this story? Quite a bit, actually. Myth #1: Columbus wanted to prove the world was not flat. The theory that the earth was flat and that it was therefore possible to sail off the edge of it was common in the middle ages, but had been discredited by Columbus' time.
The first is the bais that is show in American History textbooks, and the second is historiography, or the study of the development of how history is written. “Lies My Teacher Told Me” facilitates its process of depicting the writing of American History. Bias is one of the major problems in not only American textbooks, but throughout the world. Am example of bias that is a continuous through “Lies My Teacher Told Me” is heroification. In the book, Loewen decribes it as, "A generative process that makes people over into heroes.
In the 1500s, the Spanish arrived in the New World with the intent to convert natives to Catholicism, trade, and discover riches. Juan de Onate, one of these explorers, killed thousands of natives in order to gain fame and wealth. The Spanish and Indians also developed the Columbian Exchange; a trade of goods, livestock, and crops, which was beneficial to both sides as it brought new items to both groups. Most of the products that the Spanish gave to the natives brought diseases that the Indians had no immunity to. Cortez even intentionally gave out