1.When a buyer rejects nonconforming goods and purchases the appropriate goods from a different seller, this is an example of which of the following: Specific Performance Revoking Acceptance Lawsuit for Money Damages Cover LAW 421 final exam answers Details 2.Which of the following would be considered intangible property? Hydrocarbons Pharmaceuticals A right of ownership or possession An apartment 3.Upon her return home from work, Maria discovered that her lawn has been mowed and trimmed. An hour later, a male stranger comes to her door for payment for the lawn work. Maria refuses any payment because she had not hired him to do the work. In these circumstances Maria would not have to pay anything.
Barabin sued and was awarded $10,200,000 in which AstenJohnson appealed. AstenJohnson appealed on ground that Barabin’s expert Dr. Cohen credentials weren’t extremely credible. Also the district court did not hold a Daubert hearing to determine if Cohen was qualified and they allowed the jury to determine if Cohen’s testimony was credible. Procedural History: AstenJohnson appealed the District court’s ruling and so The United States Court of Appeals; Ninth Circuit discovered that the district court failed to assess the scientific methodologies that Dr. Cohen applied. The Ninth Circuit stated that since the district court allowed for the jury without making any determinations regarding Dr. Cohen’s accusations, the court constituted an abuse of discretion requiring a new trial.
Tallas died sometime later, but never altered his will to include the plaintiff. Upon settlement of the estate, the plaintiff submitted a claim with the attached memorandum, laying claim to $50,000 of the estate. The estate denied the claim, and as such the plaintiff brought suit against the estate for the sum of $50K. The court found that the gesture was no more than an expression of gratitude and there was no obvious exchange of consideration that would entitle the plaintiff to a portion of the estates proceeds. The plaintiff appealed.
Everybody who was not either a missionary or a person who married a Cherokee had to leave. It seemed that if the law would have been broken, it would be because someone did not have a license in the Cherokee land but actually, the first conflict broke with seven missionaries. The seven missionaries refused to refuse to get a license because they argued that under the United States law, that states have no authority to pass laws concerning Indian Nations. Apart of this group is Samuel Worcester who was arrested by Georgia of his opposition of the Cherokee removal. He aggressively protested that they had no right to make a law which needed a license but at the end, Andrew Jackson stepped in and ruled that the Cherokee were a “distinct community” as America had the upper hand in the ruling.
Therefor the wife did not ratify the husband’s actions. The neighbor could not use the theory of Promissory Estoppel to obtain specific performance of the alleged contract at issue- since there was no “clear and definite” proof of an express promise. Defendants, a husband and a wife, appealed a judgment by Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, and Monmouth County, which granted specific performance of an oral contract with a right of first refusal to plaintiff neighbor. The owners claim the evidence was insufficient. Facts: LoBiondo (Plantiff) and O’Callaghan (Defendant) had multiple conversations starting in 1996 and spanning over several years regarding LoBiondo’s interest in purchasing O’Callaghan’s house.
Although he had to fight for each publication, Flynt was "rolling in dough" after selling over a million August, 1975 Hustler issues which included former First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis sunbathing nude. As his debts eased, he continued to sell Hustler issues at a favorable rate. Falwell, the son of an agnostic bootlegger and grandson of an atheist, was a southern baptist pastor and a conservative commentator. He founded the Thomas Road Baptist Church in Lynchburg, Virginia as well as the Liberty Christian Academy, and Liberty University. Today Falwell's legacy is a
Mere realization of an asset will be the best description for this transaction (Scottish Australian Mining Co Ltd v FCT (1950)), the profit was not assessable as proceeds was not ordinary income. However, according to The Taxation Ruling TR92/3 in this case, Mary does not show any intention or purpose in entering into this transaction to make a profit (FCT v Whitfords Beach Pty Ltd – 82 ATC 4031). Lastly, Mary has discussed with the local estate agent and decided to subdivide the balance of eight hectares into four subdivided lots. Finally she sold two lots by 30th June 2013 for $200,000. By doing this, we can be seen that this transaction is for commercial purpose, so the profit for selling two lots which is $400,000 is added to assessable income (FCT v Whitfords Beach Pty Ltd-82 ATC 403).
Two thirds of all complaints submitted to the FEPC were dismissed. Truman had also done little to help the FEPC while they were active. But as I said, he had higher priorities at that time. Truman publicly slated Adam Clayton Powell after he insulted his wife. The DAR had refused to allow Powell's wife to perform in their hall.
Because he did this without parliaments approval parliament got angry. In the beginning the people used to pay at least 97.6% of ship money but by the time it was 1639 no one really cared and only 20% paid. A man called John Hampden stood up to the king and refused to pay ship money, Hampden was put on a trial and found guilty. But everyone else thought he was a hero. In 1637 the Scottish were told by Charles they had to use a new prayer book for their church but the Scottish didn't want to and got angry so they decided to rebel against him.
They came to that verdict because he was black, and he wasn’t a citizen, so he was not entitled to the rights of a citizen. They said Scott had no right to sue, never had been free, and that the Constitution didn’t declare that territories could prohibit slavery, which meant the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. Luckily for Scott, after the decision, Peter Blow's sons (childhood friends) had helped pay Scott's legal fees over the years. After the Supreme Court’s decision, the sons had bought Dred and Harriet R. Scott, and set them free. Unfortunately, Scott died nine months